Back

Heterozygous MMACHC burden variants are associated with higher circulating vitamin B12 in the All of Us Research Program

Cai, L.; DeBerardinis, R. J.

2026-06-04 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.06.03.26354855 medRxiv
Show abstract

Heterozygous carriers of autosomal recessive disease variants are conventionally considered unaffected, yet population-scale genomic datasets reveal subclinical carrier phenotypes. MMACHC encodes a cobalamin-processing protein whose biallelic loss causes cobalamin C deficiency, an inborn error of intracellular cobalamin metabolism. We performed an unbiased quantitative phenome-wide association screen in All of Us Research Program v8 to identify phenotypes associated with rare heterozygous MMACHC burden variants. Serum/plasma vitamin B12 was the top quantitative association. Carriers had higher circulating B12 than non-carriers in adjusted analyses, but also higher homocysteine, suggesting that elevated circulating B12 does not reflect improved intracellular cobalamin function. Carriers were less likely to fall below conventional B12 insufficiency thresholds, indicating a potential diagnostic blind spot. A pathway-wide rare-variant gene-burden (All-by-All) gene-burden analysis placed this finding in broader biological context. Burdens in genes related to circulating B12 binding or intestinal absorption were associated with lower circulating B12. In contrast, burdens in several genes involved in cellular delivery and intracellular cobalamin handling were associated with higher circulating B12. This step-specific directionality supports a model in which elevated circulating B12 can reflect impaired cellular handling and consequent systemic accumulation rather than improved cellular cobalamin availability. Because EHR-derived B12 is shaped by heterogeneous clinical and medication contexts, prospective carrier-enriched studies with standardized methylmalonic acid, homocysteine, diet, supplement, medication, comorbidity, and symptom ascertainment are needed to evaluate functional-marker-based screening.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.6%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 9%
14.9%
3
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
4
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
6
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
8
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
9
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.1%
10
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Nature Metabolism
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
15
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
16
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
17
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
18
Human Genetics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.7%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.7%
24
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
26
Genetics in Medicine Open
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
27
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%