Pooled testing for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in schools: real-world evaluation of transmission control, testing resources, and educational disruption

Pooled testing programs were introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic to expand surveillance capacity while preserving testing resources, but evidence on their epidemiological impact in schools under real-world conditions remains limited. We analyzed data from the pooled testing program implemented in public primary schools of the canton of Basel-Landschaft, Switzerland, during the Fall-Winter 2021 Delta wave. We used an agent-based transmission model informed by pooled and individual testing results, school characteristics, contact networks, and community incidence. The model was fitted to pooled positivity ratios in four clusters of administrative areas with similar epidemic trajectories. We compared pooled testing with alternative protocols in terms of school transmission, testing volume, and student-days lost. During the study period, pooled testing was offered to 21'187 students across 62 public primary schools, with high and stable participation across clusters (mean 71-79%). The fitted model reproduced observed pool positivity trends well. Compared with pooled testing, reactive class closure, reactive screening, and symptomatic testing were associated with higher in-school transmission, with excess ranging from 50% to 87%, 63% to 104%, and 72% to 133% across clusters. Weekly individual screening achieved similar reductions in transmission but required 15-25 times more tests. Relaxing class closure after depooling substantially reduced student-days lost without increasing transmission. Under real-world conditions, pooled testing provided an effective and resource-efficient strategy to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission in primary schools. Combining early detection of asymptomatic infections with low testing demands, pooled testing offers a scalable approach to school surveillance and control for pandemic response in educational settings.