Back

Universal Periodic Review recommendations and trajectories of maternal health between 2005 and 2023: a longitudinal ecological analysis of 89 countries

Uppal, A.; Thomas, R.; De Pasquale, M.; Sillo, J.; Getahun, H.

2026-06-05 public and global health
10.64898/2026.06.03.26354800 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: The Universal Periodic Review (UPR) is a peer-review mechanism established to hold UN Member States accountable for human rights including the right to health, yet evidence on its impact on health outcomes is limited. We evaluated whether UPR engagement is associated with accelerated improvements in maternal health trajectories. Methods and Findings: We conducted a longitudinal ecological analysis of 89 countries with a baseline maternal mortality ratio (MMR) of 70 or greater per 100,000 live births in 2005. Outcomes were trajectories of annual MMR, skilled birth attendance (SBA), and contraceptive prevalence rate (CPR), from 2005 to 2023. The exposure was the volume of health-related UPR recommendations received across three cycles, thematically classified using a validated rule-based algorithm. Mixed-effects models adjusted for time-varying GDP per capita and historical fragility. The 89 countries received 41,733 UPR recommendations across three cycles, of which 405 (1%) were related to maternal health. Maternal health recommendations were preferentially directed at countries with higher baseline MMR and lower SBA. After adjustment, each additional maternal health recommendation was associated with a 0.24% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.08, 0.40] faster annual reduction in MMR, a 0.52% [0.12, 0.91] faster annual gain in the odds of SBA, and a 0.21% [0.09, 0.34] faster annual gain in the odds of CPR. Broader recommendations on women's health and health systems and services were also associated with faster annual improvements in trajectories across all three outcomes; recommendations on abortion, family planning, sexual health and wellbeing, and sexual education tended to be directed towards lower-burden countries and were not associated with differences in any trajectories. It is important to note that the ecological design precludes causal inference. Conclusions: Receiving UPR recommendations on the themes of maternal health, womens health, and health systems and services are associated with accelerated improvements in maternal health trajectories among high-burden countries. These findings suggest that international human rights accountability mechanisms may have a role in supporting national progress on maternal health.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
2
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.3%
4
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
6
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
7
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
11
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.9%
14
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
16
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
17
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
20
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.0%
23
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
26
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
27
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
28
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
29
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%