Back

Spatiotemporal spinal integration of descending and spinal volleys in spinal motor circuits revealed by compound motor evoked potentials

Tanaka, Y.; Sasaki, A.; Hakariya, N.; Arakawa, H.; Mashiki, Y.; Aoki, R.; Masugi, Y.; Sayenko, D. G.; Nakazawa, K.

2026-06-07 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.02.729725 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Descending corticospinal and afferent pathways underlying spinally evoked motor potential both contribute to motor output, yet how their interaction at the spinal and peripheral levels is organized spatially within a muscle remains unclear. This study investigated the spatiotemporal characteristics of descending modulation of spinally evoked motor potentials by combining subthreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS). In Experiment 1, spinally evoked motor potentials were recorded from multiple lower-limb muscles at various interstimulus intervals (ISIs) defined relative to central conduction time (CCT). Subthreshold TMS facilitated spinally evoked motor potentials from CCT onward across all recorded muscles, with additional bilateral facilitation observed at longer ISIs. In Experiment 2, high-density surface electromyography (HDsEMG) revealed distinct intramuscular activation patterns in the tibialis anterior. The center of gravity (CoG) of TMS-induced motor evoked potentials was located more proximally than that of spinally evoked motor potentials. Notably, the CoG of facilitation maps was shifted further proximally than that of both single-stimulus responses. These findings suggest that descending and afferent inputs preferentially recruit partially distinct motoneuron pools within the same muscle. The proximal bias of facilitation indicates recruitment of additional motoneurons rather than uniform amplification of existing activity. Together, these results demonstrate that the interaction between descending and afferent inputs is both timing-dependent and spatially non-uniform, providing new insight into sensorimotor integration in the human lower limb.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.7%
2
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 10%
9.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.6%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.3%
6
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.2%
7
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
8
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
9
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
10
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.9%
11
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
12
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
13
Brain Research
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
15
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
16
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.1%
18
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
20
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.6%
21
Progress in Neurobiology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
Experimental Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%