Epigenetic conditioning improves sequence-based modeling of gene regulation across cell types and alleles
Dixon-Luinenburg, O.; Bajwa, A.; Vollger, M. R.; Stergachis, A.; Streets, A. M.; Ioannidis, N. M.
Show abstract
Epigenetic state modulates gene regulation in a manner not always predictable from DNA sequence alone, yet current genomic deep learning models do not leverage epigenetic state as input. We present MethylSeqNet, a model that conditions pretrained sequence embeddings on CpG methylation, a stable epigenetic mark increasingly available from long-read sequencing data. Using a novel conditioning mechanism enabling scalability and interpretability, MethylSeqNet improves predictions in cases where differential epigenetic state drives regulatory variation. We show improvements over a sequence-only baseline for cell-type-specific chromatin accessibility and transcription. Epigenetic conditioning enables prediction of phenomena not encoded in allele sequence, including parent-of-origin imprinting, random monoallelic activity, and X-inactivation. We highlight a promising application of methylation conditioning by predicting the effects of a structural rearrangement in one rare disease patient case study. In silico motif insertion analysis confirms that MethylSeqNet learns methylation-dependent regulatory grammar, establishing a paradigm for integrating epigenetic information into genomic deep learning with immediate applications in rare disease interpretation.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Connecting high-resolution 3D chromatin organization with epigenomics 96%
- Gapped-kmer sequence modeling robustly identifies regulatory vocabularies and distal enhancers conserved between evolutionarily distant mammals 96%
- Fine-mapping of nuclear compartments using ultra-deep Hi-C shows that active promoter and enhancer elements localize in the active A compartment even when adjacent sequences do not 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.