Back

Agent-based modelling of a nematode system provides general insights into the evolutionary constraints and modulators of phenotypic plasticity, bet-hedging, and environmental homeostasis

Tarantino, R.

2026-06-05 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.06.02.729670 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In this study, I implemented an agent-based model aimed at exploring the competition between plastic and non-plastic genotypes in a digital environment with periodic fluctuations in food resources, using the dimorphic nematode Pristionchus pacificus as a proxy for mixed-strategy systems showing a combination of stochastic and conditional phenotype production. Emerging behaviours generated in response to variation in three main variables, that is, i) intrinsic cost of plasticity, ii) timescale of environmental fluctuation, and iii) degree of plasticity, were monitored in terms of frequency and time to fixation of two alleles of the developmental switch gene eud-1, one enabling mouth-form dimorphism and predation, the other leading to the constitutive expression of a single, bacterivorous morph. Interestingly, while intermediate-to-long periods of environmental stability (in terms of generations) and a higher level of plasticity might favour the evolution of plastic strategies in a "cost-free" condition, the introduction and increase of inherent costs of plasticity could make pure bet-hedging more advantageous, induce a sequential collapse in the frequency of fixation of plastic strains and time of coexistence between strains, and make the invasion by non-plastic mutants more likely until a plateau is reached. In addition, asymmetries in fitness between the two morphs might be an almost necessary condition to enable the invasion of a non-plastic population by plastic genotypes. Collectively, while confirming some previous theoretical findings, these outcomes could uncover the sensitivity of a mixed-strategy system to even small changes in key variables, suggesting the existence of phase transitions and critical evolutionary constraints.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.6%
2
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
3
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.6%
4
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.7%
5
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.4%
6
Evolution Letters
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.5%
9
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.1%
11
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
12
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
Antibiotics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.9%
15
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
16
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.5%
19
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
BMC Evolutionary Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
22
Animal Behaviour
73 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
23
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
24
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%