Back

Structure of a dopamine-binding RNA aptamer reveals metal-mediated ligand recognition

Siwik, S. H.; Stelzig, D.; Hall, S. D.; Batey, R. T.

2026-06-03 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.06.02.729643 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The selection of small-molecule binding RNA aptamers enables the creation of ligand-responsive RNA tools, yet most aptamers fail to operate reliably across diverse environments. Scaffolded selection addresses this limitation by preserving the tertiary architecture of a riboswitch scaffold while driving the evolution of a new ligand-binding pocket. Using the xpt purine riboswitch aptamer, we previously generated dopamine-binding aptamers. Here, we report the crystal structures of two representative variants in their apo and dopamine-bound states to define how they recognize ligand while maintaining scaffold integrity. The structures demonstrate that scaffolded selection enforces global fold conservation and retains the defining tertiary interactions of the parental riboswitch. Local remodeling, triggered by deletions acquired during selection, rewires the three-way junction to build extensive interaction networks that host the dopamine-binding pocket. A deeply buried potassium ion anchors ligand recognition by coordinating the dopamine hydroxyl group while the RNA engages the catechol ring through stacking and hydrogen bonding interactions. Structure probing shows minimal conformational changes upon ligand binding, indicating that the aptamers adopt a largely preorganized fold. These findings strengthen the central premise of scaffolded selection: riboswitch-derived "superfolder" architectures can bias in vitro selections towards aptamers that conserve global structure while supporting locally diverse binding pockets. This balance between structural stability and local plasticity expands the capacity of a single RNA fold to recognize chemically distinct ligands and positions scaffolded selection as a powerful platform for engineering robust RNA-based sensing and regulatory devices. TOC Abstract (graphical) O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=114 SRC="FIGDIR/small/729643v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (37K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d7818dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@7a8efcorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4170ccorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5473ac_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
2
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.1%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.5%
5
Nature Chemical Biology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.0%
7
Nature Chemistry
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.5%
8
Biochemistry
148 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
9
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
10
Cell Chemical Biology
94 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.0%
12
Chemical Communications
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
13
RSC Chemical Biology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
14
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
ACS Central Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
17
JACS Au
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
19
ChemBioChem
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
20
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
21
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
22
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%