Back

From recognition to neglect: Molecular and physiological responses to heterospecific pollen decay with evolutionary distance

Cohen, R. O.; Masi, A.; Chin, S. M.; Williams, J. O.; Eaton, D. A. R.

2026-06-05 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.06.02.729600 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Post-mating, pre-zygotic (PMPZ) reproductive barriers are often attributed to precise molecular recognition between male and female gametes, yet little is known about how these interactions change as species diverge. In flowering plants, pollen tube growth depends on coordinated signaling between pollen and pistil, raising the question of whether PMPZ barriers arise through active incompatibility mechanisms or gradual loss of pollen-pistil coordination. Here, we combined transcriptomic profiling and pollen tube growth assays across a phylogenetically structured set of crosses in a diverse alpine plant community. We show that the magnitude of the pistillar transcriptomic response to pollination declined quantitatively with evolutionary distance rather than shifting in a binary compatible/incompatible manner. Pollination-associated functional gene ontology categories were strongest in conspecific and intrageneric crosses and weakened with divergence. Heterospecific pollen tubes also grew more slowly than conspecific tubes, with growth rates declining overall with genetic distance. However, the slowest growth occurred in intrageneric crosses, suggesting that close relatives may represent a distinct evolutionary zone where reduced maternal support coincides with additional hindrance mechanisms. Together, these results support a graded, divergence-dependent model of pollen-pistil incongruence driven primarily by attenuation of coordinated growth rather than strict heterospecific rejection.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Plant Cell
161 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
17.9%
2
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
11.5%
3
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
11.5%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.5%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 7%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.5%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.5%
8
Nature Plants
94 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.4%
9
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
11
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
12
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
13
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Evolution Letters
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.7%
16
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
17
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
18
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 80%
0.6%
22
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%