Back

The RNA helicase DDX21 cooperates with ETS1 and FLI1 in cell cycle, immune evasion, and snoRNA processing in activated B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cells

Sartori, G.; Priebe, V.; Cascione, L.; Favre-Juilland, M.; Guzzardo, V.; Pizzi, M.; Chung, E. Y.; Napoli, S.; Arribas, A. J.; Ghiringhelli, A.; Giuffrida, S.; Forcato, M.; Rinaldi, A.; Barraja, P.; Bicciato, S.; Scott, D.; Thome, M.; Bertoni, F.

2026-06-05 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.06.02.729583 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a clinically and biologically heterogeneous disease, with the activated B-cell-like (ABC) subtype showing inferior outcomes. The ETS transcription factors ETS1 and FLI1 are recurrently gained and functionally relevant in DLBCL, yet their pathogenetic function is still to be fully elucidated. Here, we describe their cooperation with the RNA regulatory machinery, demonstrating that the RNA helicase DDX21 is a central effector of the ETS1/FLI1 transcriptional network in ABC-DLBCL. Our proteomic analyses revealed that ETS1 physically interacted with DDX21 and other RNA processing factors. As ETS1, DDX21 was preferentially expressed in ABC-DLBCL, particularly in the MCD/C5 genetic subtype, and it was associated with adverse clinical outcomes in this lymphoma subtype. Genetic and pharmacological studies demonstrated that DDX21 was essential for ABC-DLBCL cell proliferation. DDX21 also coordinated various transcriptional programs, which were revealed by integrated RNA-Seq, small RNA-Seq, ChIP-Seq, and Capture Hi-C analyses. DDX21-dependent transcription was relevant for ribosome biogenesis, MYC signaling, cell cycle progression, and immune evasion, but also regulated non-coding RNA networks, including microRNAs and small nucleolar RNAs, in particular SNORA37. Collectively, our data establish DDX21 as a nucleolar hub linking ETS transcription factors to coding and non-coding RNA programs that sustain aggressive lymphoma biology. These findings suggest DDX21 and ETS-RNA helicase complexes as promising therapeutic vulnerabilities in ABC-DLBCL.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.8%
2
Blood
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
Cell Death & Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
5
HemaSphere
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 12%
3.3%
7
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.3%
8
Blood Cancer Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
9
Oncogene
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of Experimental Medicine
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
Cell Discovery
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
Blood Advances
62 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
13
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.4%
14
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.3%
15
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Leukemia
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
18
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
Cell Communication and Signaling
51 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
20
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
21
Nature Cell Biology
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
22
EMBO Reports
263 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
23
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
24
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.9%
26
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
27
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
29
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
30
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%