Back

Immersive bottle effect: Influence of virtual object simulation on modulation of corticospinal excitability by motor imagery

BONNET, C.; BEHAVA, M.; ARGON, S.; Grospretre, S.

2026-06-05 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.02.729504 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Motor imagery is a cognitive process that engages the motor system and facilitates motor learning, recovery, and performance. Its effectiveness relies on the activation of corticospinal pathways, which can be modulated by action observation. This study investigated whether observing graspable objects facilitates corticospinal excitability during motor imagery, and whether immersive virtual reality amplifies this effect. Twelve healthy adults of either sex completed a single session involving six conditions: rest, object observation on a screen or in virtual reality, motor imagery alone, and combined observation with motor imagery. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to record motor-evoked potentials from hand and forearm muscles, and fatigue and imagery quality were quantified. Results showed that observing a manipulable object during motor imagery significantly increased corticospinal excitability. This facilitation was strongest when the object was presented in a virtual environment. The effect was muscle-specific, targeting the agonist hand muscle of the imagined action (Abductor Pollicis Brevis), and was more pronounced at the higher stimulation intensity. Fatigue and imagery quality were similar across conditions. These findings indicate that object affordances can prime motor circuits and enhance motor imagery-induced neural activation, with immersive environments further reinforcing this effect. This is the first study demonstrating that combining motor imagery with virtual object observation maximizes corticospinal excitability. This approach may represent a promising tool for rehabilitation and sports training. Further studies should identify the optimal parameters and the neurophysiological markers of cortical modulation for this combination. NEW & NOTEWORTHYUsing transcranial magnetic stimulation with immersive virtual reality, we showed for the first time that observing a virtual object associated with the imagined movement increased corticospinal excitability to a greater extent than motor imagery performed alone.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
2
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 5%
9.7%
4
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.8%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.7%
6
Human Movement Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.2%
8
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
9
European Journal of Applied Physiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
11
Brain Research
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
13
The Cerebellum
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
16
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Brain Stimulation
125 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
18
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
21
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
24
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.6%
29
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
30
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%