CarotidMamba: Foundation Model-Enabled CTA Phenotyping of Symptomatic Carotid Plaques in a Multi-Center Retrospective Study
Liu, Y.-S.; Dou, X.-W.; Zheng, P.-Y.; Feng, W.; Ma, L.-J.; You, Y.-N.; Shao, G.-W.; Shen, J.-G.; Yu, X.; Qiao, C.; Cheng, Z.-W.; Li, Z.-W.; Su, F.; Zhang, B.-W.; Qu, X.-H.; Jiang, g.
Show abstract
Background: Treatment decisions for carotid atherosclerotic disease rely primarily on luminal stenosis, although plaque vulnerability and symptomatic status better reflect short-term cerebrovascular risk. A scalable CTA tool for automated phenotyping of symptomatic carotid disease is lacking. Materials & Methods: In this multi-institutional retrospective study, 689 patients (mean age, 67.9 {+/-} 7.7 years; 366 men) from four hospitals were analyzed after screening 705 CTA examinations. 423 patients from one center were used for five-fold development and internal validation, and 266 patients from three centers for independent external validation. CarotidMamba, a deep learning framework combining dual foundation-model encoders with Mamba-based sequence modeling, was developed and benchmarked against clinical, radiomics, clinic-radiomics, CNN, and transformer comparators. Results: In the development cohort, CarotidMamba achieved an AUC of 0.839 (95% CI, 0.799-0.879) and accuracy of 0.825 (95% CI, 0.793-0.857), outperforming the strongest comparator by 0.066 and 0.050, respectively. External validation yielded AUCs of 0.897 (95% CI, 0.835-0.959) in YCH, 0.809 (95% CI, 0.720-0.898) in DCH, and 0.762 (95% CI, 0.649-0.875) in GH-NTC. CarotidMamba showed the lowest Brier score and expected calibration error across cohorts, with calibration slopes near 1.0. Conclusion: CarotidMamba provides an interpretable, clinically oriented, and externally validated CTA framework for phenotyping symptomatic carotid plaques, supporting vulnerability-aware imaging assessment beyond stenosis alone.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Weakly supervised classification of rare aortic valve malformations using unlabeled cardiac MRI sequences 92%
- Clinically Applicable Deep Learning for Intracranial Aneurysm Detection in Computed Tomography Angiography Images: A Comprehensive Multicohort Study 92%
- Biomarker panels for improved risk prediction and enhanced biological insights in patients with atrial fibrillation 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multimodal deep learning enhances diagnostic precision in left ventricular hypertrophy 90%
- Prediction of heart transplant rejection from routine pathology slides with self-supervised Deep Learning 90%
- International Evaluation Of An Artificial Intelligence-Powered Ecg Model Detecting Occlusion Myocardial Infarction 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Opportunistic Assessment of Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Using Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography and Medical Record Data: a Multimodal Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach 95%
- AngioNet: A Convolutional Neural Network for Vessel Segmentation in X-ray Angiography 93%
- Dual Adversarial Deconfounding Autoencoder for joint batch-effects removal from multi-center and multi-scanner radiomics data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- ViFIT-assisted Histopathology: From H&E Style Standardization to Virtual Fiber Image Transformation 90%
- Strain estimation in aortic roots from 4D echocardiographic images using medial modeling and deformable registration 89%
- Clinical Validation of Saliency Maps for Understanding Deep Neural Networks in Ophthalmology 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.