Optimising the Usability of AI Driven Augmented Reality Displays of Critical Structures During Surgery - An International Study of Surgeon-Computer Interaction
Ramirez Herrera, R.; Khan, D. Z.; Wijekoon, A.; Bano, S.; Clarkson, M. J.; Marcus, H.; Blandford, A.; CARES Evaluation Group,
Show abstract
In many endoscopic surgical procedures, the surgical team must identify and remove pathological tissue while avoiding critical structures such as arteries and nerves. Augmented reality (AR) offers potential support by overlaying visual information about the location of pathology and critical structures directly onto the operative field, enhancing spatial awareness and surgical navigation. However, limited research has evaluated how best to design and present AR overlays in ways that align with surgical workflow and perception. This study investigates surgeons' preferences across three key AR overlay dimensions: Design (how anatomy is visualised: outlines, heatmaps, masks, or centroids), Trigger (how and when overlays are activated: always visible, activated by the user, or triggered by instrument position), and Placement (where the overlay appears: above or below the surgical instrument). We take endoscopic pituitary adenoma surgery as a high-risk exemplar. Using a web-based prototype, 38 neurosurgeons ranked options and provided qualitative feedback. Surgeons preferred outline designs for clarity, user-activated triggers for control of information flow and distraction minimisation, and below-instrument placement for better spatial awareness. Preferences were consistent across experience levels and emphasised the importance of balancing visual saliency with cognitive load, to facilitate surgical navigation without distraction or disruption. These findings inform AR interface design, but require evaluation for impact on surgical performance and safety in further physical simulation and clinical studies.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 94%
- What do blind people "see" with retinal prostheses? Observations and qualitative reports of epiretinal implant users 94%
- The Impact of a Wireless Audio System on Communication in Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: A Prospective Controlled Trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of the Federated Data Platform's digital surgery scheduling system on elective theatre utilisation at an NHS Trust: an interrupted time series analysis 92%
- Development of a customised data management system for a COVID-19-adapted colorectal cancer pathway 91%
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Student self-assessment: feasibility, advantages and limitations Example of a workshop for trainee surgeons using a suture score 93%
- Large language models for generating medical examinations: systematic review 93%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Purchasing high-cost medical equipment in hospitals: A systematic review 91%
- Evaluating a first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) methodology: results from a feasibility study 91%
- Validity of intraoperative imageless navigation (Naviswiss™) for component positioning accuracy in primary total hip arthroplasty: Protocol for a prospective observational cohort study in a single-surgeon practice 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptions of Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine: Insights from a Large-Scale International Cross-Sectional Survey of Surgery Researchers and Clinicians 93%
- Cloud-controlled microscopy enables remote project-based biology education in Latinx communities in the United States and Latin America 89%
- Assessing visual performance during intense luminance changes in virtual reality 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.