Back

Neurodiversity in the Paediatric Chronic Pain Clinic: An Audit

Buechner, H.; Themistokleous, G.; Orr, M.; Lawson, E.; Smart, E.; Donaghy, A.; Wallace, E.

2026-06-03 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.06.02.26354725 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: To compare the characteristics, management and outcomes of neurodivergent (ND) children with neurotypical (NT) children attending a chronic pain clinic. Design: An audit of all patients attending the clinic from 2010-2025 using electronic patient records. Setting: A tertiary pain centre in Scotland. Patients: 724 patients were included in the analysis, 193 (26%) were neurodivergent. Patients were included if they had a documented referral to the pain clinic and attendance to at least one clinic appointment. Patients were excluded if no pain clinic letter could be found on their records. Results: There was a significant increase in the percentage of children with neurodiversity attending the chronic pain clinic compared to neurotypical children (p = 0.004) accounting for over a third of children last seen in the period of 2023-2025. ND children were most likely to present with musculoskeletal pain compared with NT children (p = 0.033) representing over half of all ND children's presentations with pain. ND children were more likely to report being bedbound (18% ND, 13% NT, p = 0.0352) or needing a walking aid (40% ND, 25% NT, p = 0.000) due to chronic pain and had a higher number of referrals (ND median = 18.4, 1QR, NT median = 12.44, IQR10.28 p = 0.000). ND children were more likely to live in areas of deprivation (Cochran-Armitage test, Z -2.15, p = 0.0315). Conclusions: Children with neurodiversity are overrepresented in the chronic pain clinic, and more often present to tertiary services with musculoskeletal pain. They are more likely to have multiple referrals, spend longer with the pain service and less likely to be discharged due to pain improvement. These findings highlight the need for focused strategies to address chronic pain in neurodivergent children. Services should consider how best to identify and support children with neurodiversity and chronic pain. Key Messages {middle dot} What is already known on this topic: While there has been research regarding the role of neurodiversity in pain perception, there are gaps in knowledge regarding the influence of neurodiversity on the development and persistence of chronic pain in children. {middle dot} What this study adds: A growing proportion of neurodiverse children attended the pain clinic. Neurodiverse children presented with more severely impactful pain, they spent a longer duration of time within the pain clinic and were less likely to be discharged due to pain improvement. {middle dot} How this study might affect research, practice or policy: Identifying neurodiverse children as a patient group with distinct requirements may prompt adaptations in chronic pain management practices. This audit provides an initial framework for subsequent research.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
19.0%
3
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
5
Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
7
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
8
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
9
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
13
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
15
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
16
Journal of Dental Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
17
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
18
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
19
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
21
Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
22
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
23
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%