Back

The Third Dimension of Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamic Theory: Adaptive Rate Capacity as a Conserved Constraint on Biological Tolerability

Kleinbloesem, C. H.; Braal, C. L.

2026-06-03 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.64898/2026.06.02.26354717 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Classical pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) theory models exposure-effect in two dimensions: magnitude and time. Rate-dependent toxicity has been documented across therapeutic domains but never formalised as a conserved biological constraint. Methods We developed the Human Adaptive Rate Limit (HARL) framework, formalising the maximum tolerable velocity as |dS/dt|_max = sigma_max / tau. We validated HARL across five domains using published trial data and a reanalysis of the longitudinal biomarker data from the 202-patient CAR-T cohort of Wei et al (2023). An 8-ODE quantitative systems pharmacology model guided biomarker selection. Early biomarker velocities (maximum positive slope within days 0-5) were computed for ferritin and D-dimer. Patients were classified as high-risk only if both velocities exceeded their thresholds (dual-velocity classifier). Thresholds were identified by grid-search optimisation of the Youden index and assessed by leave-one-out cross-validation. Findings A prospective crossover study (Kleinbloesem 1987, n=8) demonstrated that matched steady-state nifedipine concentrations produce divergent haemodynamic responses depending solely on rate of rise, anticipating the dose-related mortality signal subsequently reported across ~8350 patients with coronary heart disease (Furberg 1995), a meta-analysis that was itself debated. Convergent evidence spans haematology (CHOIR, 1432 patients, hazard ratio [HR] 1.34 [1.03-1.74] for aggressive Hb correction), radiation (dose-rate effectiveness factor [DDREF] 1.5-2.0), and infusion pharmacology. In the CAR-T cohort, high-risk classification (ferritin >232 ng/mL per day AND D-dimer >1.21 mg/L per day) predicted severe CRS with 100% sensitivity (~78% specificity) in safety rule-out mode and 91.1% sensitivity (93.6% specificity, AUC 0.95 [95% CI 0.91-0.98]) in Youden-optimised mode. Median kinetic lead time was 4 days (range 3-7) before clinical decompensation. Interpretation Biological tolerability is three-dimensional. HARL unifies rate-dependent toxicity across domains spanning minutes to weeks. MTDyn--specifying target level and allowable rate of change--should supplement conventional dose-response assessment.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.2%
2
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.4%
4
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
8
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
10
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.3%
16
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
19
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
21
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
24
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Statistics in Medicine
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
29
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%