Back

Revisiting Plasmodium vivax molecular correction

Taylor, A. R.; Foo, Y. S.; White, M. T.

2026-06-04 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.06.02.26354709 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Reliable inference of Plasmodium vivax recurrence states - relapse, recrudescence and reinfection (the ``3Rs'') - improves estimates of antimalarial efficacy. The R package Pv3Rs features a Bayesian model designed for P. vivax molecular correction, i.e., using parasite genetic data to infer recurrence states. The model is an extension of a prototype built to analyse microsatellite data from the Vivax History (VHX) and Best Primaquine Dose (BPD) trials. Methods: We re-analysed data from 212 VHX and BPD trial participants (493 recurrences) using Pv3Rs, comparing results with those from the prototype and with genetic relatedness estimated using Dcifer, a tool for estimating relatedness based on identity-by-descent. Posterior recurrence state probabilities were computed using both uniform and time-to-event priors: artificial but equal prior probabilities facilitate posterior interpretation, while time-to-event priors leverage all available information and enable re-computation of failure rates. Relatedness estimates were used to identify and correct instances of model misspecification. Results: The Pv3Rs model generated posterior probabilities for all recurrences and was able to jointly model data on all episodes per participant for 89% of participants, compared with 73% using the prototype. Recurrence state probabilities were broadly consistent across methods, though the Pv3Rs model elevated reinfection probabilities slightly. Relatedness estimates exposed various outliers consistent with half-sibling parasites and/or genotyping errors. Outlier correction impacted some per-participant failure probabilities, but reinfection-adjusted radical-cure failure rates of high-dose primaquine remained near 3%, in line with previous findings. Conclusion: Re-analysis of VHX and BPD P. vivax genetic data restates earlier reinfection-adjusted efficacy estimates. It demonstrates the increased computational capability and misspecification sensitivity of Pv3Rs, highlighting a need for careful analyses. Using relatedness-based diagnostics alongside model-based inference, we were able to harness the advantages of model-based inference and provide a framework for future P. vivax molecular correction.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.1%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.9%
3
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
6
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
10
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
11
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
12
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
23
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
24
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
26
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
27
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
International Journal for Parasitology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
29
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.6%
30
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%