Back

Automated histopathological measurements of the tumor micro-environment predict distant metastasis after stage I/II Melanoma: discovery and validation in the population-based Dutch Early-Stage Melanoma (D-ESMEL) study

Kerkour, T.; Hollestein, L.; Nigg, A.; Li, Y.; Damman, J.; Zhou, C.; Nijsten, T.; Mooyaart, A.

2026-06-03 dermatology
10.64898/2026.06.02.26354705 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract: Background: More than half of metastatic melanomas arise from patients initially diagnosed with early-stage melanoma. Objective biomarkers are needed to better identify high-risk patients. Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of multiple histopathological characteristics in predicting distant metastasis risk, in early-stage melanoma. Methods: Using data from discovery set (n=442) and a population-based validation cohort (n=306, sampled from 5,815 patients) of the Dutch Early-Stage Melanoma (D-ESMEL) study, we investigated 14 histopathological characteristics of melanoma and their tumor micro-environment (TME) in an unprecedented integration, by expert pathologist scoring and automated quantitative measurements derived from a validated automated segmentation. Results: Increased immune infiltrates (40% in cases vs. 50% in controls) were associated with lower risk of metastasis. Automated immune cell density was predictive in both the discovery set and the validation cohort, outperforming the manual pathological tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. The remaining histopathological features, including mitotic activity, did not retain independent value after controlling for current staging variables. Limitations: TME evaluation in standard Hematoxylin-Eosin slides. Conclusion: TME reaction is an important determinant of melanoma progression. The automated quantification of immune cell density appears to be a biomarker for distant metastasis risk. Further investigation into specific immune cell subtypes is required to facilitate clinical integration.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.1%
4
Experimental Dermatology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
JID Innovations
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
7
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.2%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.3%
9
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
12
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
13
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
15
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Blood Advances
62 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
17
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
British Journal of Dermatology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
OncoImmunology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
22
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
23
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
26
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
27
Biology
45 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
28
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
29
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%