Back

Automated histopathological measurements of the tumor micro-environment predict distant metastasis after stage I/II Melanoma: discovery and validation in the population-based Dutch Early-Stage Melanoma (D-ESMEL) study

Kerkour, T.; Hollestein, L.; Nigg, A.; Li, Y.; Damman, J.; Zhou, C.; Nijsten, T.; Mooyaart, A.

2026-06-03 dermatology
10.64898/2026.06.02.26354705 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract: Background: More than half of metastatic melanomas arise from patients initially diagnosed with early-stage melanoma. Objective biomarkers are needed to better identify high-risk patients. Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of multiple histopathological characteristics in predicting distant metastasis risk, in early-stage melanoma. Methods: Using data from discovery set (n=442) and a population-based validation cohort (n=306, sampled from 5,815 patients) of the Dutch Early-Stage Melanoma (D-ESMEL) study, we investigated 14 histopathological characteristics of melanoma and their tumor micro-environment (TME) in an unprecedented integration, by expert pathologist scoring and automated quantitative measurements derived from a validated automated segmentation. Results: Increased immune infiltrates (40% in cases vs. 50% in controls) were associated with lower risk of metastasis. Automated immune cell density was predictive in both the discovery set and the validation cohort, outperforming the manual pathological tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. The remaining histopathological features, including mitotic activity, did not retain independent value after controlling for current staging variables. Limitations: TME evaluation in standard Hematoxylin-Eosin slides. Conclusion: TME reaction is an important determinant of melanoma progression. The automated quantification of immune cell density appears to be a biomarker for distant metastasis risk. Further investigation into specific immune cell subtypes is required to facilitate clinical integration.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
2
Experimental Dermatology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.8%
4
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.8%
5
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
7
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
8
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
10
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
11
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
13
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
15
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
Experimental Eye Research
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
19
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
20
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
21
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
23
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
25
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
26
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
28
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
29
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
Allergy
23 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%