Back

Automatic Speech Recognition and Phonetics-Informed Sentence Design for Spastic Dysarthria Detection and Corticobulbar Lesion Localization

Marukatat, C.; Kaewrak, K.; Chunamchai, S.; Chunharas, C.

2026-06-03 neurology
10.64898/2026.06.02.26354698 medRxiv
Show abstract

Spastic dysarthria diagnosis through subjective neurologist auditory-perceptual assessment remains standard practice despite known inaccuracy. To address this gap, we developed an objective framework grounded in phonetic evidence that spastic dysarthria preferentially impairs initial consonant articulation, using automatic speech recognition (ASR) to quantify dysarthria and localize corticobulbar lesions. We created four reading sentences targeting groups of initial consonants: labial (facial), lingual-alveolar (tongue), and velopharyngeal (pharyngeal/soft-palate) sentence, along with a mixed-consonant sentence for comparative evaluation. Thirty-seven patients with neuroimaging-confirmed corticobulbar lesions and 37 controls read each sentence. ASR transcribed dysarthric speech into text, and we computed a "syllable-error score" by counting incorrectly transcribed syllables. This yields a clinically meaningful feature that makes syllable-level phonetic errors explicit. Logistic regression models were trained for each sentence, and performance was summarized by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) across 10,000 resampled train-test splits. Consonant-specific sentences significantly outperformed the mixed sentence: the lingual-alveolar sentence performed best with (median AUC 0.88), followed by the labial (0.80), then the velopharyngeal sentence (0.72), while the mixed-consonant sentence was lowest (0.67). These results suggest that the interpretable ASR-derived syllable error feature, combined with a relevant machine learning classifier could inform clinical insight into consonant-specific vulnerability in spastic dysarthria, with lingual-alveolar consonants appearing particularly informative. Overall, this novel ASR-based framework, together with phonetics-informed feature design provides objective, accurate, and clinically meaningful digital quantification for spastic dysarthria detection and corticobulbar lesion localization.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.4%
2
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.0%
4
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
5
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.4%
6
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
8
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
9
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
12
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
13
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.3%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
17
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
19
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
20
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
21
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
24
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%