Automatic Speech Recognition and Phonetics-Informed Sentence Design for Spastic Dysarthria Detection and Corticobulbar Lesion Localization
Marukatat, C.; Kaewrak, K.; Chunamchai, S.; Chunharas, C.
Show abstract
Spastic dysarthria diagnosis through subjective neurologist auditory-perceptual assessment remains standard practice despite known inaccuracy. To address this gap, we developed an objective framework grounded in phonetic evidence that spastic dysarthria preferentially impairs initial consonant articulation, using automatic speech recognition (ASR) to quantify dysarthria and localize corticobulbar lesions. We created four reading sentences targeting groups of initial consonants: labial (facial), lingual-alveolar (tongue), and velopharyngeal (pharyngeal/soft-palate) sentence, along with a mixed-consonant sentence for comparative evaluation. Thirty-seven patients with neuroimaging-confirmed corticobulbar lesions and 37 controls read each sentence. ASR transcribed dysarthric speech into text, and we computed a "syllable-error score" by counting incorrectly transcribed syllables. This yields a clinically meaningful feature that makes syllable-level phonetic errors explicit. Logistic regression models were trained for each sentence, and performance was summarized by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) across 10,000 resampled train-test splits. Consonant-specific sentences significantly outperformed the mixed sentence: the lingual-alveolar sentence performed best with (median AUC 0.88), followed by the labial (0.80), then the velopharyngeal sentence (0.72), while the mixed-consonant sentence was lowest (0.67). These results suggest that the interpretable ASR-derived syllable error feature, combined with a relevant machine learning classifier could inform clinical insight into consonant-specific vulnerability in spastic dysarthria, with lingual-alveolar consonants appearing particularly informative. Overall, this novel ASR-based framework, together with phonetics-informed feature design provides objective, accurate, and clinically meaningful digital quantification for spastic dysarthria detection and corticobulbar lesion localization.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Application of Digital Tools and Artificial Intelligence to the Myasthenia Gravis Core Examination 92%
- Kinematic Correlates of Early Speech Motor Changes in Cognitively Intact APOE-ε4 Carriers: A Preliminary Study Using a Color-Word Interference Task 92%
- Brainstem evoked auditory potentials in tinnitus: a best-evidence synthesis and meta-analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hearing and cognitive decline in aging differentially impact neural tracking of context-supported versus random speech across linguistic timescales 93%
- Effects of Sensorimotor Voice Training on Event-Related Potentials to Pitch-Shifted Auditory Feedback 91%
- Tongue thickness measured by ultrasonography is associated with tongue pressure in the Japanese elderly 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Quantitative Study of Factors Influencing Myasthenia Gravis Telehealth Examination Score 93%
- Feasibility of high-density surface electromyography for the detection of neuromuscular disorders in children 91%
- Multipoint Stimulation Motor Unit Number Estimation of the Extensor Indicis and Anconeus after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.