Breast cancer over-diagnosis due to mammography screening - A long-term follow-up population study of BreastScreen Norway
Heggland, T.; Vatten, L. J.; Opdahl, S.; Weedon-Fekjaer, H.
Show abstract
Objectives Estimates of breast cancer over-diagnosis related to mammography screening varies substantially. Over-diagnosis is commonly defined as cases that would not have been detected during the persons remaining lifetime in the absence of screening. We here aim to quantify over-diagnosis in the population-based BreastScreen Norway mammography screening program using long-term follow-up and more detailed modeling than previous studies. Setting We applied data on Norwegian screening patterns and breast carcinoma incidence for the period 1987-2019, covering women aged 49-84 years, leveraging the gradual implementation of the organized biennial BreastScreen Norway screening program for women aged 50-69 during 1995-2005. Methods Using an extended age-period-cohort model, we estimated excess lifetime risk of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ in the presence of program screening, as an indicator of over-diagnosis among screen-detected cases. Results Lifetime risk of breast carcinomas was 6.6% (95% confidence interval 2.5% to 10.7%) higher for invited than for non-invited women. This indicates that 18% (95% confidence interval 7.3% to 28.0%) of screen-detected cases may be over-diagnosed, and that approximately one in 86 (95% confidence interval 54 to 210) screened women were over-diagnosed during their screening period. Using effect estimates from previous studies, we estimated that approximately three women are over-diagnosed for every breast cancer death prevented by screening, and that 87% of over-diagnosed tumors might grow extremely slowly. Conclusions Over-diagnosis related to mammography screening is a considerable problem, but its extent may be smaller than reported in some previous studies. Most over-diagnosed tumors likely grow very slowly.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel mammogram-based measures improve breast cancer risk prediction beyond an established mammographic density measure 93%
- Long-Term Impact of Stressful Life Events on Breast Cancer Risk: A 36-Year Genetically Informed Prospective Study in the Finnish Twin Cohort 92%
- Prelude to Malignancy: A Gene Expression Signature in Normal Mammary Gland from Breast Cancer Patients Suggests Pre-tumorous Alterations and Is Associated with Adverse Outcomes 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Increased adiposity is protective for breast and prostate cancer: a Mendelian randomisation study using up to 132,413 breast cancer cases and 85,907 prostate cancer cases. 92%
- Area-based socioeconomic inequalities in cancer mortality in Germany – widening, narrowing or reversing inequalities between 2003 and 2019? 91%
- Rho GTPase transcriptional activity and breast cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Causal effects of breast cancer risk factors across hormone receptor breast cancer subtypes: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study 95%
- A Quantitative Framework to Study Potential Benefits and Harms of Multi-cancer Early Detection Testing 91%
- Hereditary haemochromatosis beyond liver cancer: increased risk of prostate cancer during an 11-year follow-up 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of cancer in regular and low meat-eaters, fish-eaters, and vegetarians: a prospective analysis of UK Biobank participants 94%
- Investigating the effect of sexual behaviour on oropharyngeal cancer risk: a methodological assessment of Mendelian randomization 92%
- Maternal smoking during pregnancy and type 1 diabetes in the offspring: A nationwide register-based study with family-based designs 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.