Back

Effects of interdisciplinary early developmental intervention programs on behavior, executive functioning and participation in children born preterm: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Schirle, L.; Babel, M.; Briem, J.-S. J.; Gawehn, N.; Janka, H.; Metzendorf, M.-I.; Trunk, E.; Wohlleben, J.; Weibel, S.; Spiegler, J.

2026-06-03 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.06.02.26354617 medRxiv
Show abstract

Aim: To systematically evaluate evidence on the effects of post-discharge early developmental intervention programs (EI) on behavioral development, quality of life, participation, executive functioning, parent-child interaction, and use of medical services from infancy through adolescence in children born preterm. Method: Four bibliographic databases and one trial registry were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials up to April 23, 2024. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. In clinically and methodologically comparable studies, random-effects meta-analysis were performed. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and certainty of evidence with the GRADE approach. Results: Twenty-six studies met inclusion criteria, eleven studies including 2,315 preterm born infants reported relevant outcomes, and seven contributed to meta-analyses. Most reported results showed some concerns or high risk of bias; certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate across outcomes. EI may offer small benefits for selective attention, behavioral problems and parent-child interaction. Little to no effect was found for special educational needs, language skills, executive functioning and the use of medical services. No included studies evaluated the effect of EI on ADHD, quality of life, or participation related to mobility or leisure activities. Interpretation: EI may improve problems typically seen in preterm children and should be offered especially to those with additional medical or social risk factors. High-quality, contemporary trials are needed to establish reliable clinical recommendations regarding EI strategies and complementary interventions throughout childhood.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
2
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.3%
4
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
6
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
7
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
11
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
13
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
15
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
16
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
17
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
21
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
22
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
26
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
27
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
30
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%