Back

Sensorimotor recovery and neuropathic pain reduction after remotely delivered cognitive multisensory rehabilitation or remotely delivered exercise in adults with spinal cord injury: a pilot clinical trial.

Van de Winckel, A.; Herrmann, A. A.; Carpentier, S. T.; Bottale, S.; Lopez, R. L.; Rapacz, A. D.; Larson, S. J.; Deng, W.; Zhang, L.; Hendrickson, T. J.; Mueller, B. A.; Nourian, R.; Morse, L. R.; Lim, K. O.

2026-06-09 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.06.02.26354574 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction: Reduced or lost sensation and movement after a spinal cord injury (SCI) impairs the brain s ability to accurately localize paralyzed body parts, causing deficits in its internal body map, or mental body representations (MBR). These deficits hinder functional recovery and contribute to neuropathic pain. Medications for neuropathic pain are often ineffective and carry side effects. Our pilot trials found that in-person Cognitive Multisensory Rehabilitation (CMR), a physical therapy restoring MBR, led to prolonged pain reduction, improved sensorimotor function, and enhanced brain function, to greater extent than adaptive fitness. To explore more accessible interventions for those in rural areas or with transportation challenges, we examined whether 12 weeks of remotely delivered CMR or exercise would (1) improve function and reduce pain; (2) increase brain activity and connectivity related to sensorimotor function and MBR in adults with SCI. Methods: Of 19 adults with SCI who consented, 15 (51+/-15 years old, 8+/-10 years post-SCI) were randomized to 12 weeks of remotely delivered CMR or exercise (45min, 3x/week). Eight reported neuropathic pain equal or greater than 3/10. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS), and Neuromuscular Recovery Scale (NRS) assessed pain and sensorimotor function at baseline, post-intervention, and 6-month follow-up. Functional MRI included resting-state and four tasks: imagining feeling the left leg, imagining moving the left leg, whole-body movement imagery, and a sensation task. Results: After CMR (n=8), participants improved on AIS (large effect sizes: touch: d=1.30; pinprick: d=1.21; lower limb motor function: d=1.83). Exercise (n=7) produced smaller improvements (touch: d=0.35; pinprick: d=0.36; lower limb motor function: d=0.80). CMR showed greater NRS effect sizes (core: d=1.48; upper limb: d=0.69; lower limb: d=1.25) than exercise (core: d=0.31; upper limb: d=0.74; lower limb: d=0.83). Benefits persisted at follow-up for both AIS and NRS, especially in the CMR group. Highest neuropathic pain intensity decreased in both groups post-intervention (CMR: d=-0.61; exercise: d=-0.73) and at 6-month follow-up (CMR: d=-0.55; exercise: d=-0.55). Unlike previous studies, group effects for CMR were not found due to high heterogeneity. Increased task-based activation, including in the lateral occipital cortex involved in visual body perception and spatial awareness, was seen for the exercise group (n=5). Discussion: These preliminary results support the potential of remotely delivered CMR and exercise to improve function and reduce neuropathic pain in adults with SCI, highlighting the need for larger trials. Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT05870189

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
2
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
4
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
8
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
9
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
11
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
12
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
13
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
14
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
16
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
17
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
22
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
24
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
29
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%