Rationale and Design of RECOVER-ENERGIZE: A Platform Clinical Trial of Interventions for Exercise Intolerance With and Without Post-exertional Malaise in Long COVID
Friedly, J.; Bateman, L.; Berdan, L. G.; Casaburi, R.; Erdmann, N.; Felker, G. M.; Itchon-Ramos, N.; Keteyian, S. J.; MacIntyre, N. R.; OBrien, L.; Reist, C.; Rossiter, H. B.; Silverstein, A. P.; Taylor, E.; Pike Welch, H.; Yanez, N. D.; Zimmerman, K. O.; Make, B.
Show abstract
Introduction: A prominent symptom of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (i.e., Long COVID) is exercise intolerance with or without post-exertional malaise (PEM). PEM is characterized by the worsening of both symptoms and function following even minor physical or mental exertion, with symptoms typically worsening 12 to 48 hours after activity and lasting for days or even weeks. Individualized, supervised cardiopulmonary rehabilitation is considered a safe and effective intervention for many cardiac and pulmonary conditions, and has been effective in gradually improving function in previously hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients with severe COVID-19. While traditional cardiopulmonary rehabilitation approaches appear helpful in some situations, the exercise intolerance symptoms experienced by many individuals with Long COVID may require a different approach, especially when attempts to increase physical activity result in PEM. No clear consensus exists on the optimal treatment of PEM, and no major studies have evaluated the efficacy in individuals with Long COVID of either carefully supervised, individualized cardiopulmonary rehabilitation programs for exercise intolerance without significant PEM or activity pacing interventions designed to treat or prevent PEM. Methods and Analysis: The Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery Clinical Trials (RECOVER-CT) initiative funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) included a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled platform trial (RECOVER-ENERGIZE) designed to assess two interventions in patients with Long COVID and exercise intolerance: (1) cardiopulmonary rehabilitation for patients without significant PEM and (2) structured activity pacing to prevent or reduce PEM in participants who experience the symptom. The intervention duration will be 12 weeks. The primary endpoints for the trial include the Endurance Shuttle Walk Test as a measure of endurance capacity for the cardiopulmonary rehabilitation intervention and a modified version of the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire - Post-Exertional Malaise for the pacing intervention. Assessments will be completed at baseline, middle of intervention, end of intervention, and 12 weeks after completion of the intervention, and include physical performance measures and patient-reported surveys. Ethics and Dissemination: The RECOVER-ENERGIZE trial protocol has been approved by an institutional review board (Advarra), and written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrollment. The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06404047). Formally assessing PEM and developing a structured activity pacing intervention delivered by local pacing coaches are novel features of this trial. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, presentations at scientific conferences, and communication with participants, patient advocacy organizations, and the broader Long COVID community. De-identified participant data will be made available through the NIH RECOVER data repository in accordance with NIH data-sharing policies. If successful, this protocol will provide accessible tools that clinicians can use to address exercise intolerance and PEM in patients with Long COVID.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- HEART rate variability biofeedback for LOng Covid symptoms (HEARTLOC): protocol for a feasibility study 95%
- The Basel Long COVID Cohort Study (BALCoS): protocol of a prospective cohort study 94%
- Effects of 12 weeks of Multi-nutrient supplementation on the Immune and Musculoskeletal systems of Older Adults in Aged-Care (The Pomerium Study): Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multimodal Prehabilitation in People Awaiting Acute Inpatient Cardiac Surgery: Study Protocol for a Pilot Feasibility Trial (PreP-ACe) 94%
- Heavy Resistance Exercise Training in Older Men: A Responder and Inter-individual Variability Analysis 94%
- Feasibility of individualized home exercise programs for patients with head and neck cancer – study protocol and first results of a multicentre single-arm intervention trial (OSHO #94) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Moderate-Intensity Exercise Versus High-Intensity Interval Training to Recover Walking Post-Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 96%
- The effect of osteotomy technique (flat-cut vs wedge-cut Weil) on pain relief and complication incidence following surgical treatment for patients presenting with metatarsalgia in a private metropolitan clinic: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial 92%
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Helmet Non-Invasive Ventilation for COVID-19 Patients (Helmet-COVID) Randomized Controlled Trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cardiopulmonary exercise testing to evaluate post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (“Long COVID”): a systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Effect of Montelukast vs Placebo on Time to Sustained Recovery in Outpatients with COVID-19: The ACTIV-6 Randomized Clinical Trial 91%
- Corticosteroids in COVID-19: Optimizing Observational Research through Target Trial Emulations 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-pharmacological therapies for post-viral syndromes, including Long COVID: A systematic review 93%
- Practical recommendations for staying physically active during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review 92%
- Role Of Body Mass And Physical Activity In Autonomic Function Modulation On Post-COVID-19 Condition: An Observational Subanalysis Of Fit-COVID Study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.