Back

Aperiodic and oscillatory activity of the human brain during induced emotional states

Park, H.; Hacker, C.; Cho, H.; Xie, T.; Simmons, A.; Tan, G.; Leuthardt, E. C.; Brunner, P.; Willie, J.

2026-06-09 neurology
10.64898/2026.06.02.26354146 medRxiv
Show abstract

Normal emotional experience depends on dynamic modulation of neural excitability across limbic and prefrontal circuits, yet the spectral markers that reflect these shifts in humans remain incompletely understood. In this study, we combined a validated video-based emotion induction paradigm with stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG) in 31 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy to investigate how positive and negative affective states modulate oscillatory and aperiodic (asynchronous) neural activity. Using spectral parameterization to dissociate oscillatory power from the aperiodic 1/f component, we found that emotional valence robustly altered the aperiodic slope in a regionally specific manner: negative valence flattened the slope in thalamus, posterior insula, and posterior cingulate cortex, whereas positive valence produced flattening in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Simultaneous oscillatory changes included increased high-frequency activity and decreased alpha/beta power during negative affect, and reduced alpha power during positive affect, which were elucidated after adjusting for broadband aperiodic spectral shifts. These effects persisted after controlling for audiovisual stimulus or physiological features and were not evident in simultaneously recorded scalp EEG, underscoring their localization to intracranial sites. Together, these results provide the first direct evidence that active induction of emotional states modulates the aperiodic slope of human intracranial field potentials, reflecting valence-dependent shifts in local circuit excitability. The findings highlight the 1/f slope as a sensitive neural marker of affective brain states and for mood dysregulation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.