Back

Sea-level and climate changes drive lineage diversification in the imperiled Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula J. Ellis, Droseraceae)

Zhou, W.; Poindexter, D. B.; Winshell, J.; Urquia, D.; Johri, P.; Jones, C.; Copenhaver, G. P.; Kunz, M.; Randall, J.

2026-06-03 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.06.01.729438 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula) is an insectivorous plant in the monotypic genus Dionaea, endemic to the Southeastern United States, and found in a small geographic range in North and South Carolina. Its unique morphology and natural history have intrigued biologists for centuries, yet the evolution of populations has not been adequately characterized. Population decline, driven primarily by disruptive land conversion, fire suppression, and illegal harvesting/poaching underscores the urgency of defining the genetic diversity in the present population to guide species conservation. We applied a genome-wide SNP dataset to analyze admixture and population structure and used coalescent modeling to trace the ancestry and migration of geographically distinct population clusters. Our population dynamics model supports four lineages, with the North Cape Fear Arch lineage as the ancestor of all lineages and two genetically distinct Sandhills lineages derived from the South Cape Fear Arch lineage independently at [~]13 Ma and [~]3 Ma, respectively, during peak climate optima periods and maximal sea level rise. Severe population decline events occurred among all lineages, with two ancient instant bottleneck population decline events in Sandhills lineages and two recent ones in the two Cape Fear Arch lineages, which contributed to the current genetic structure. Shorter peduncle lengths in Sandhills populations correspond with suspected local adaptation to Sandhills habitats.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
2
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.4%
3
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.7%
4
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
5
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
6
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
7
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.4%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
10
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
11
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
12
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.3%
14
Evolution Letters
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.3%
15
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 17%
2.1%
16
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.1%
17
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
18
Journal of Heredity
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.7%
21
BMC Evolutionary Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
22
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.1%
24
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
25
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
26
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
29
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
30
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%