Spatiotemporal Decoding of Explore-Exploit Decisions in the Human Brain
Yadav, R.; Romero, J. D.; Stephen, J. M.; Houck, J. M.; Cavanagh, J. F.; Costa, V. D.; Hogeveen, J.
Show abstract
Adaptive behavior requires flexibly shifting between exploiting familiar rewards and exploring novel opportunities. These explore-exploit decisions are implemented via a distributed brain network--anchored in frontopolar cortex (FPC) and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC)--that computes the total value of a given choice by weighting the immediate value of familiar options against the latent future value of exploration. Capturing the precise temporal dynamics of these neural computations across spatially distributed cortical networks is critical to resolving how the brain manages this tradeoff. Here, we combined magnetoencephalography (MEG) with partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) modeling during a reinforcement learning task. By decoding POMDP-derived choice policies in MEG source space, we mapped the precise spatiotemporal emergence of explore-exploit decisions across the cortex. We demonstrate that explore-exploit policy implementation unfolds via a hierarchical functional dissociation across the rostral prefrontal cortex. During decision formation, the lateral FPC initiates the strategic shift toward exploration hundreds of milliseconds before choice execution. Conversely, vmPFC and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) do not exhibit early significant divergence from the baseline exploitative trace on exploration trials, displaying only a delayed, transient peak prior to choice execution. Following feedback, the vmPFC and OFC transition to a sustained representation of the choices empirical value to update reward expectancies and guide future actions. Mapping reinforcement learning variables onto millisecond-resolved neural data reveals how the human brain resolves the explore-exploit dilemma: through early strategic initiation of exploration in the FPC, a delayed exploratory shift in vmPFC and OFC, and sustained outcome evaluation to optimize future actions.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-feature-specific elevated responses and feature-specific backward replay in human brain induced by visual sequence exposure 97%
- Frequency-specific neural signatures of perceptual content and perceptual stability 97%
- Successor-like representation guides the prediction of future events in human visual cortex and hippocampus 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Linguistic coupling between neural systems for speech production and comprehension during real-time dyadic conversations 96%
- Neural mechanisms of credit assignment for inferred relationships in a structured world 96%
- Neuro-computational account of arbitration between imitation and emulation during human observational learning 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.