Back

Depression Severity Modulates the Cognitive Process of Facial Affect Representation: Evidence from a Genetic-Algorithm Face Synthesis Task

Cui, B.; Bex, P. J.

2026-06-04 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.01.729421 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Depression is associated with biased facial emotion processing, yet existing paradigms measure only the recognition of pre-selected stimuli, conflating the process of forming an internal representation with its endpoint product. Here, we used a genetic-algorithm (GA) face synthesis task to disentangle these components. Fifty-seven undergraduates (40 Low Risk, 17 At Risk by Beck Depression Inventory-II) iteratively evolved photorealistic 3D faces to match their internal representations of 13 emotions across seven generations in a 199-dimensional face shape space. We extracted five evolutionary metrics capturing how participants constructed their representations (convergence speed, velocity, stability, range) and the structure they ultimately produced (peak intensity). At Risk participants converged on embarrassment representations significantly faster than Low Risk participants (d = 0.88, p = .001, FDR-corrected, permutation-validated), reaching their template in roughly half the number of generations. Anger representations showed greater evolutionary instability in the At Risk group (d = -0.75, p = .029, permutation-validated). Critically, endpoint face intensities did not differ between groups for any emotion. These results suggest that depression severity is associated with rigid self-conscious emotion schemas and unstable anger representations during face generation, reflecting altered cognitive processes rather than distorted perceptual products. The findings extend cognitive schema theory to the domain of facial affect representation and highlight self-conscious emotions as an underexplored locus of depression-related perceptual bias.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 8%
7.7%
3
Psychological Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.1%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.2%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.2%
7
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 15%
3.4%
10
Biological Psychology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
11
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
12
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.3%
14
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
15
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
16
Neuroscience of Consciousness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
17
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
18
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
19
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
20
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
21
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
Consciousness and Cognition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
23
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
24
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
25
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
26
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
27
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.0%
28
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.8%
29
Journal of Psychiatric Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
30
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%