Back

Stress adaptation of free-living microbes generates novel benefits to plant hosts

Ricks, K.; Bhatt, K.; Frederickson, M. E.

2026-06-02 microbiology
10.64898/2026.06.01.729403 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Most microbes that live in or on hosts are not obligate symbionts. Instead, they often cycle between host-associated and free-living phases and experience selection in both environments. The benefits that microbes confer to hosts are often assumed to be a product of host-microbe (co)evolution, but microbial benefits to hosts may also evolve independent of the host-microbe interaction, while the microbe is free-living. We investigated this hypothesis by experimentally evolving a beneficial Allorhizobium bacterium we had previously isolated from duckweed (Lemna japonica). We evolved this Allorhizobium strain in the absence of any host at high and low salinity and at high and low nitrogen, and then tested how the evolved strains performed as symbionts when host-associated. Microbial salinity adaptation drove the emergence of novel benefits to host plants in high-salinity environments. However, these locally adaptive benefits emerged only when microbes evolved under low-nitrogen conditions; microbial adaptation to high nitrogen reduced plant growth. Bacterial phenotyping indicated that the same microbial traits that underlie salinity adaptation mediate host benefits. Whole-genome sequencing of the evolved strains revealed significant genomic shifts between selective treatments, including plasmid variation and point mutations associated with osmotic regulation. The emergence of the microbial benefits to hosts, as a byproduct of microbial adaptation, highlights that these benefits do not require targeted host-microbe co-evolution. Rather, predicting the evolutionary trajectory of these symbioses may require understanding both the abiotic and biotic selective agents acting on key microbial traits mediating the host-microbe interaction.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.9%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.5%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.5%
5
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 24%
5.0%
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.7%
8
Nature Microbiology
155 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
9
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
10
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
11
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
12
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
13
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
Cell Host & Microbe
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
15
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
16
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
17
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%
19
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
20
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%