A growth-maintenance tradeoff determines nutrient-limited growth in phytoplankton
Ranjan, R.; Ryabov, A.; Halsey, K.; Hillebrand, H.; Thomas, M. K.; Blasius, B.
Show abstract
Phytoplankton encounter a range of light and nutrient conditions in nature and must adjust their internal carbon and nitrogen allocations to grow across different resource environments. Current phytoplankton carbon budget models treat respiration simply as a carbon loss. In reality, respiration is a critical cellular process that produces energy for nutrient uptake and cellular maintenance. Drawing on empirical evidence, we developed an eco-physiological model that incorporates a more realistic role of respiration. In our model, photosynthetic carbon is partitioned into: (i) the Pentose Phosphate Pathway (PPP) for assimilation and (ii) respiration for energy production that is then used in nutrient uptake. Stored nitrogen is partitioned between three pools: cellular structure, photosynthesis and nutrient uptake. Using an optimality-based approach, we identify strategies that maximize either exponential growth rate or competitive ability. We find that optimal internal allocations follow a growth-maintenance tradeoff, favoring population growth through carbon acquisition in nitrogen-replete conditions and population maintenance through nitrogen acquisition in nitrogen-limited conditions. The optimal allocations match empirically observed shifts in carbon partitioning at different dilution rates. Our model also generates an interactive growth response surface with an asymmetry, where light is the dominant limiting factor at low light intensities and co-limitation by light and nitrogen only occurs at high light levels. Furthermore, the model recovers the widely accepted Droop function for growth vs nitrogen quota and predicts a hyperbolic decline in growth vs energy quotas. Through a simple growth-maintenance tradeoff, our model provides a mechanistic foundation for predicting phytoplankton productivity in biogeochemical models.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.