Back

A growth-maintenance tradeoff determines nutrient-limited growth in phytoplankton

Ranjan, R.; Ryabov, A.; Halsey, K.; Hillebrand, H.; Thomas, M. K.; Blasius, B.

2026-06-04 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.01.729340 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Phytoplankton encounter a range of light and nutrient conditions in nature and must adjust their internal carbon and nitrogen allocations to grow across different resource environments. Current phytoplankton carbon budget models treat respiration simply as a carbon loss. In reality, respiration is a critical cellular process that produces energy for nutrient uptake and cellular maintenance. Drawing on empirical evidence, we developed an eco-physiological model that incorporates a more realistic role of respiration. In our model, photosynthetic carbon is partitioned into: (i) the Pentose Phosphate Pathway (PPP) for assimilation and (ii) respiration for energy production that is then used in nutrient uptake. Stored nitrogen is partitioned between three pools: cellular structure, photosynthesis and nutrient uptake. Using an optimality-based approach, we identify strategies that maximize either exponential growth rate or competitive ability. We find that optimal internal allocations follow a growth-maintenance tradeoff, favoring population growth through carbon acquisition in nitrogen-replete conditions and population maintenance through nitrogen acquisition in nitrogen-limited conditions. The optimal allocations match empirically observed shifts in carbon partitioning at different dilution rates. Our model also generates an interactive growth response surface with an asymmetry, where light is the dominant limiting factor at low light intensities and co-limitation by light and nitrogen only occurs at high light levels. Furthermore, the model recovers the widely accepted Droop function for growth vs nitrogen quota and predicts a hyperbolic decline in growth vs energy quotas. Through a simple growth-maintenance tradeoff, our model provides a mechanistic foundation for predicting phytoplankton productivity in biogeochemical models.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.4%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.6%
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.3%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 10%
5.0%
5
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
6
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.7%
7
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
8
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
9
Theoretical Ecology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.1%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
13
Ecological Modelling
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
14
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.5%
16
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.3%
17
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
18
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
19
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.8%
20
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
21
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
22
Journal of Phycology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
23
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
26
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
27
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
Limnology and Oceanography
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
29
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%