Back

Ploidy shapes gemcitabine response through altered potency and delayed cell death

Tagal, V.; Li, T.; Kumar, R. J.; Shrestha, P.; Yu, X.; Miroshnychenko, D.; Olumoyin, K. D.; Davies, M.; Marusyk, A. D.; Maudsley, S.; Gomes, A. P.; El-Naqa, I.; Duckett, D. R.; Han, H. S.; Andor, N.

2026-06-04 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.06.01.729318 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tumor ploidy is increasingly recognized as a determinant of therapeutic response, but the mechanisms by which ploidy shapes sensitivity to specific cytotoxic agents remain unclear. Here, we investigated the relationship between ploidy and gemcitabine response using pharmacogenomic reanalysis, isogenic cancer cell systems, live-cell imaging, intracellular pharma-cokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) measurements, and mathematical modeling. Across public pharmacogenomic datasets, gemcitabine emerged as a low-ploidy-selective cytotoxic agent. In matched isogenic low- and high-ploidy cell systems, higher-ploidy cells were consistently less sensitive to gemcitabine across multiple lineages. Focused live-cell imaging and PKPD measurements in near-diploid and near-tetraploid SUM-159 cells showed that both states formed intracellular dFdCTP, but high-ploidy cells exhibited weaker and slower treatment responses, with delayed accumulation of cell death. To quantify these differences, we developed a delay-aware live/dead model driven by intracellular dFdCTP exposure. The best-fit model identified both reduced effective gemcitabine potency and a substantially longer delay from intracellular drug action to observed death in high-ploidy cells. Specifically, the inferred mean delay was approximately 17.5 hours in near-diploid cells versus 42.5 hours in near-tetraploid cells. The model also supported a thresholded, nonlinear, and ploidy-dependent mapping from administered gemcitabine dose to effective intracellular drug action. Together, these results establish ploidy as a determinant of both the magnitude and timing of gemcitabine response and provide a quantitative framework for linking intracellular drug exposure to delayed cytotoxic outcomes across ploidy states.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.6%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.5%
3
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.4%
4
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.7%
6
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 8%
3.9%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
9
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.1%
11
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
12
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
13
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
14
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
15
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.9%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.7%
17
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.6%
19
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.0%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.8%
25
Nature Cancer
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Cancer Discovery
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
29
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%