Back

Spinal cord Ca2+ imaging reveals glial-driven central sensitization in post-traumatic osteoarthritis

Fung, S. W.; Harding, E. K.; Cheung, J. K.; Zhang, H.; Dalsgaard, J. L. T.; Norlock, S. M.; Biernaskie, J.; Matyas, J. R.; Hildebrand, M. E.; Stratton, J. A.; Bonin, R. P.

2026-06-04 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.01.729291 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Central sensitization may be defined behaviourally, cellularly, or molecularly; yet these can all vary depending on the model and duration. Current electrophysiological approaches are time and labour intensive. Here, we developed a Ca2+ imaging and analysis pipeline (CuMIN) that implements semi-automated detection and analysis of cellular Ca2+ activity in rodent spinal cord slices, from which distinct signatures were defined for various acute and chronic pain models. Spinal cord slices from male mice were isolated after inducing pathological pain in a variety of well-established surgical or pharmacological approaches, incubated in a cell-permeant Ca2+ indicator, and imaged with epifluorescence microscopy. Intensity and temporal features of spontaneous and glutamate-evoked Ca2+ events were processed by linear discriminant analysis to map unique clusters of activity for each pain model. The resulting activity map of spinal dorsal horn activity is substantially different in the surgical model of chronic pain induced by post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA), which lacks clear mechanistic evidence of central sensitization. Specifically, the PTOA Ca2+ activity signature overlapped with chemotherapy-induced neuropathy and neuropathic pain models, both of which are associated with gliosis-induced central sensitization. We confirmed gliosis in the PTOA model by immunostaining IBA1 and GFAP and observed analgesic effects of intrathecal carbenoxolone, Gap27, and minocycline that targeted glial activity. These findings validate CuMIN as a sensitive and specific approach for defining the basic cellular signatures of spinal central sensitization, with the utility of identifying potential therapeutic targets and serving as a translational platform for novel drug discovery across various acute and chronic pain models.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
17.5%
2
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.4%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.1%
4
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.4%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 10%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 13%
3.9%
7
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
8
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
10
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
13
Arthritis Research & Therapy
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
15
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
18
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
19
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
21
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
22
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Glia
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
27
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
28
British Journal of Pharmacology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%