Back

Cell-specific regulatory circuits connect genetic variation to disease susceptibility

Oelen, R.; Korshevniuk, M.; Niewold, J.; Kaptijn, D.; van der Werff, M.; Bonder, M. J.; sc-eQTLGen Consortium, ; Franke, L. H.; van der Wijst, M. G. P.

2026-06-03 immunology
10.64898/2026.06.01.729215 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genome-wide association studies have identified thousands of variants associated with immune-related diseases, yet most lie in non-coding regions, complicating mechanistic interpretation. Regulatory quantitative trait loci (QTLs), such as expression QTLs (eQTLs) and chromatin accessibility QTLs (caQTLs), offer a powerful framework for prioritization and interpretation of these disease-associated genetic variants. When analyzed together, they offer deeper insights into the regulatory architecture underlying disease. We generated same-cell, single-cell multi-omics data, integrating transcriptomic and chromatin accessibility information, from 563,100 matched peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected from 264 individuals, either unstimulated or stimulated for 24h with C. albicans (CA). Across six major immune cell types, we mapped both cis-eQTLs and -caQTLs, identifying 1,571 eGenes and 28,862 caPeaks, with 41% and 11% showing a stimulation-dependent effect. Finally, to dissect the regulatory mechanisms underlying these QTL effects, we applied two complementary strategies: 1. overlapping caQTLs with eQTLs; 2. applying SCENIC+ to identify regulatory triplets containing a transcription factor, the chromatin region it may bind to and the candidate target genes it thereby may regulate. With the first approach, we identified 1,861 dual-acting QTLs. These dual-QTLs showed 1.9-fold stronger enrichment for immune-related disease associations than single-modality QTLs, highlighting their relevance for disease interpretation. With the second approach, we found 62,932 regulatory triplets, of which 1.7% were under genetic control. By then leveraging the SCENIC+-derived TF activity measurements we could study how genetic variants can rewire TF control of gene expression, ultimately shaping inter-individual variation in disease risk. Together, our network-based approach offers new insights into the cellular contexts and gene programs perturbed in disease, providing a foundation for prioritizing therapeutic targets and informing strategies for disease prevention.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
16.7%
2
Nature Immunology
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.7%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.5%
4
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.1%
5
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.0%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 12%
4.1%
8
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.4%
9
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
10
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
11
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
12
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
13
Science Immunology
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
15
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
16
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
17
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
18
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
20
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
23
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.9%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
27
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
30
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%