Back

AZD5582 robustly reactivates latently infected cells and clears the majority of those reactivated from the SIV reservoir

Phan, T.; Mavigner, M.; Dashti, A.; Chahroudi, A.; Ribeiro, R. M.; Ke, R.; Perelson, A. S.

2026-06-02 microbiology
10.64898/2026.06.01.729198 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AZD5582 (AZD) is a latency reversing agent used to support the "shock-and-kill" strategy in HIV-1 cure research. Previous studies in ART-suppressed rhesus macaques have shown that AZD can promote reactivation of latently infected cells, resulting in 2-3 log increases in on-ART viral load and significant reductions in SIV reservoir size over 5-10 doses. To quantify the impact of AZD on the reservoir, we developed an ensemble of mechanistic viral dynamic models and fit them to longitudinal plasma SIV RNA and SIV CA-DNA data from 23 macaques treated with AZD in combination with other therapies. The aggregate predictions of the model ensemble recapitulate the reactivation patterns observed in both SIV RNA and SIV CA-DNA and provide robust estimates of key parameters associated with reactivated cells. We found that AZD reactivates approximately 25% of cells in the latent reservoir per dose, with a mean reactivation duration of about 5-6 days. Of the reactivated cells, 60-79% are eventually cleared, while the remainder enter a state refractory to AZD stimulation before returning to latency. Because of this refractory state, each consecutive weekly dose reactivates about 28% fewer cells than the previous one, an effect that could be more pronounced if the refractory period substantially exceeds the interval between doses. However, the duration of this refractory state remains uncertain. Altogether, our results suggest that AZD-reactivated cells are effectively cleared. Future work should focus on improving LRAs that safely reactivate a larger fraction of the latent reservoir. Furthermore, designing experiments with varying dosing schedules can help better quantify the duration of refractoriness, which will be important for informing optimal treatment schedules and maximizing the effect of LRAs.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.3%
2
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.2%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.3%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.3%
5
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.8%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.1%
8
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.5%
9
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
10
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
11
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.0%
13
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
14
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.7%
15
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
16
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.1%
18
AIDS
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
21
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.7%
24
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.6%
26
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%