Back

Antidepressant mechanism and treatment response define distinct hippocampal-amygdala circuit biomarkers during emotional memory in humans

Castro, M.; Ballard, H.; Ferguson, L.; Leal, S. L.

2026-06-02 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.01.726320 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Antidepressant efficacy varies widely, yet the circuit-level mechanisms that distinguish treatment responders from non-responders remain poorly understood in humans. Here, we used high-resolution neuroimaging of hippocampal-amygdala networks during an emotional mnemonic discrimination task that taxes hippocampal pattern separation to examine how antidepressant mechanism of action and perceived treatment response shape emotional memory circuitry (N = 117). Participants included individuals taking single-action antidepressants (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors), multi-action antidepressants (serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitors, or polypharmacy), and unmedicated controls matched on current depression severity. Antidepressant mechanism and treatment response were associated with distinct patterns of activity in hippocampal subfields (dentate gyrus (DG)/CA3 and CA1) and amygdala subnuclei, including the basolateral amygdala (BLA) and central amygdala (CEA), during emotional mnemonic discrimination. Among non-responders, the relative balance of hippocampal activity differed by antidepressant mechanism: those taking single-action antidepressants showed greater DG/CA3 than CA1 activity, whereas those taking multi-action antidepressants showed the opposite pattern. This suggests mechanistically specific differences in hippocampal computations associated with ineffective treatment. These effects were localized to the anterior hippocampus, with no significant effects observed in posterior regions. In contrast, responders exhibited stronger DG/CA3-BLA coactivation during negative mnemonic discrimination, a pattern absent in non-responders and unmedicated controls. Antidepressant-associated differences in amygdala subnuclei activity persisted beyond current symptom severity, suggesting medication-related modulation of emotional memory circuits rather than effects driven solely by depression severity. These findings provide evidence in humans that antidepressant use is associated with altered hippocampal-amygdala circuitry in a manner that depends on both pharmacological mechanism and treatment efficacy. Identifying circuit-level signatures of treatment response may inform mechanistically guided approaches to antidepressant selection and monitoring.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.6%
2
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
3
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.3%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.4%
7
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
8
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
10
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
11
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 20%
2.1%
12
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
15
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
17
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.8%
19
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
20
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
21
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
22
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%