Back

Shared Genetic Architecture of Psychosis, Mood, and Cognition in East Asian Ancestry

Lim, K.; Van Der Es, T.; Song, J.; Howard, D. M.; Liu, J.; Lee, J.; Chen, C.-Y.; Lam, M.

2026-06-03 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.06.01.26354666 medRxiv
Show abstract

Genomic insights into psychiatric disorders remain heavily skewed toward European populations. In European-ancestry studies, educational attainment is typically negatively genetically correlated with major depression but paradoxically positively correlated with schizophrenia, raising the question of whether these relationships generalize across ancestries. We investigated whether this cross-trait architecture extends to East Asian ancestry (EAS). Using EAS GWAS summary statistics for major depressive disorder (MDD), schizophrenia (SZ), and educational attainment (EDU), we applied multi-trait (MTAG) and pleiotropy-informed (PLEIO) analyses to characterize shared genetic architecture across these traits. Across MTAG and PLEIO analyses, we identified 32 unique genome-wide significant loci (p < 5 x 10-8), including seven novel loci revealed in depression analysis that overlapped schizophrenia-associated signals, consistent with shared cross-trait architecture. Results reinforce a convergent risk architecture for affective and psychotic disorders in this population. Fine-mapping analyses prioritized variants mapping to candidate genes, including serine/threonine kinase VRK2, nominating targets for future follow-up. Cross-trait analyses supported a positive genetic relationship between EDU and MDD (rg = 0.308, p = 9.63 x 10-17) in East Asian data, contrasting to the negative correlation typically observed in European ancestry. These findings suggest that the genetic relationship between educational attainment and psychiatric risk may not be fully transferable across ancestries. In an independent cohort of individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis, MTAG-derived polygenic risk scores improved case-control discrimination relative to single-trait GWAS-based scores. These results underscore the importance of ancestry-specific genomic frameworks for interpreting cross-trait psychiatric architecture and improving polygenic prediction.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.0%
3
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
8.3%
4
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.3%
5
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
7
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.8%
8
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
9
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
11
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
12
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.1%
13
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
15
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.6%
16
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.5%
18
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
19
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
21
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
24
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%