Back

Cardiometabolic Risk and Diagnostic-Laboratory Reference-Range Disagreement in 794,811 Indian Insurance Applicants

Lakhani, S.

2026-06-03 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.06.01.26354654 medRxiv
Show abstract

This study analyzes 794,811 digitized medical examina- tions from Indian life-insurance applicants, a working-age, urban-skewed demographic often undersampled by national surveys. The cohort exhibits a pronounced South-Asian car- diometabolic risk profile: among valid adult records, 41.9% met the criteria for dyslipidemia (driven heavily by low HDL and elevated triglycerides), and 61.4% met AHA 2017 crite- ria for stage 1 hypertension. However, canonicalizing this dataset across 33,244 diagnostic centers revealed significant heterogeneity in laboratory reference ranges. At the clinical prediabetes threshold of 110 mg/dL for fasting blood sugar, the record-pair disagreement rate across laboratories was 49.7%, with similar variance across other common tests. This structural inconsistency materially affects patient classi- fication and the tracking of disease prevalence, underscoring a critical need for the national standardization of laboratory reporting in India

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.