Back

Climate change is already reshaping schistosomiasis transmission across Africa

Forstchen, M.; Aslan, I.; Bice, C.; Buelow, H.; Chamberlin, A. J.; De Leo, G. A.; Ebi, K. L.; Galle, N. A.; Heffernan, P.; Nguyen, K. H.; Sisk, M.; Rohr, J. R.

2026-06-02 public and global health
10.64898/2026.06.01.26354594 medRxiv
Show abstract

Climate change is shifting infectious disease burdens1-6, but attributing transmission changes remains difficult where interventions and socioeconomic development interact with temperature-dependent signals7-11. Mechanistic models can isolate temperature-dependent signals from non-climatic influences5,12-16 but are often not tested against independent data. Here, we present a validation-first framework using a temperature-dependent R transmission model17 to detect and attribute temperature-mediated climate impacts on schistosomiasis transmission across Africa. First, semi-natural mesocosm experiments confirmed the model's biological constraints, with high temperatures suppressing the host-parasite system above ~33{degrees}C. Next, we established epidemiological relevance in the Lake Victoria Basin using 141,829 longitudinal infection records. Interannual temperature anomalies predicted infection risk, with anthropogenic warming accounting for 17.1% of observed infections relative to a natural-forcing-only counterfactual. Finally, across Africa, the mechanistic R predictor explained prevalence better than correlative climate metrics, even after accounting for intervention and socioeconomic covariates. Applying the validated framework to ensemble climate model simulations and a natural-forcing-only counterfactual (1984-2014) showed that anthropogenic warming increased transmission potential in cooler regions while suppressing it in hotter regions across Africa, a contrast projected to intensify under higher-emissions scenarios by mid-century. Climate impacts are not solely future threats, but present-day forces already reshaping transmission and disease burden.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.