Back

Climate change is already reshaping schistosomiasis transmission across Africa

Forstchen, M.; Aslan, I.; Bice, C.; Buelow, H.; Chamberlin, A. J.; De Leo, G. A.; Ebi, K. L.; Galle, N. A.; Heffernan, P.; Nguyen, K. H.; Sisk, M.; Rohr, J. R.

2026-06-02 public and global health
10.64898/2026.06.01.26354594 medRxiv
Show abstract

Climate change is shifting infectious disease burdens1-6, but attributing transmission changes remains difficult where interventions and socioeconomic development interact with temperature-dependent signals7-11. Mechanistic models can isolate temperature-dependent signals from non-climatic influences5,12-16 but are often not tested against independent data. Here, we present a validation-first framework using a temperature-dependent R transmission model17 to detect and attribute temperature-mediated climate impacts on schistosomiasis transmission across Africa. First, semi-natural mesocosm experiments confirmed the model's biological constraints, with high temperatures suppressing the host-parasite system above ~33{degrees}C. Next, we established epidemiological relevance in the Lake Victoria Basin using 141,829 longitudinal infection records. Interannual temperature anomalies predicted infection risk, with anthropogenic warming accounting for 17.1% of observed infections relative to a natural-forcing-only counterfactual. Finally, across Africa, the mechanistic R predictor explained prevalence better than correlative climate metrics, even after accounting for intervention and socioeconomic covariates. Applying the validated framework to ensemble climate model simulations and a natural-forcing-only counterfactual (1984-2014) showed that anthropogenic warming increased transmission potential in cooler regions while suppressing it in hotter regions across Africa, a contrast projected to intensify under higher-emissions scenarios by mid-century. Climate impacts are not solely future threats, but present-day forces already reshaping transmission and disease burden.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 2%
23.4%
2
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.3%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.6%
4
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.0%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 19%
3.7%
7
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
8
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.8%
9
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
10
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
11
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.5%
15
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
17
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
18
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
20
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
22
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.7%
23
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
24
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
25
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.5%