Back

Integrative genomics reveals shared and stress-specific adaptive pathways underlying acidic soil-associated metal toxicity in rice

Jaiswal, S.; Kumari, A.; Singh, B. K.; Kumar, K.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, S.; Kaur, S.; Prakash, N. R.; Baiswar, P.; Bharati, A.; Talukdar, M.; Behera, S.

2026-06-03 genomics
10.64898/2026.05.31.729167 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Soil acidity-associated toxicities of aluminum (Al), cadmium (Cd), and manganese (Mn) severely constrain rice productivity in upland ecosystems. To investigate the genomic basis of adaptation to acidic soil-related metal stress, we conducted an integrated meta-QTL (M-QTL) and functional genomics analysis in rice. Meta-analysis of 681 QTLs and MTAs from 53 QTL mapping and GWAS studies identified 79 robust M-QTLs, including ten overlapping regions associated with Al-, Cd-, and Mn-responsive traits. A multi-criteria prioritization framework identified 98 candidate genes supported by positional overlap, transcriptomic recurrence, and functional annotation, enriched for ion transport, detoxification, and redox regulation pathways. M-QTL10.9 emerged as a major hotspot enriched for glutathione-S-transferase genes, whereas M-QTL9.5 contained the highest density of prioritized candidates linked to Al and Cd responses. Comparative physiological & biochemical analyses of the contrasting rice genotypes Sahasarang and IR64 revealed genotype-dependent differences in antioxidant responses, metal partitioning, metabolic regulation, and cell wall remodeling under individual and combined metal stresses. Expression profiling of prioritized candidate genes, including OsACO family genes, OsZIP10, and OsGSTU10, further revealed genotype-dependent transcriptional divergence under combined stress. The identification of overlapping M-QTLs across Al, Cd, and Mn datasets suggests both shared and stress-specific adaptive responses to acidic soil-associated metal stress in rice.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.7%
2
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 17%
5.4%
5
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
6
Journal of Hazardous Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
8
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
9
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
10
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
11
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
12
The Plant Genome
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
13
Plant Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
14
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.0%
16
Molecular Plant
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
Journal of Integrative Plant Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
19
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
21
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
22
Plant Stress
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
23
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
24
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.1%
26
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
27
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
28
Plant and Cell Physiology
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
29
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
30
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%