Back

Brain states recur across diverse narrative contexts during longitudinal viewing

Chen, Y.; Ghavami, M.; St-Laurent, M.; Bellec, L.; Ghosh, S. S.

2026-06-03 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.31.729141 bioRxiv
Show abstract

What does the brain do during the continuous, varied experience of watching a story unfold? One account holds that the brain traverses a finite repertoire of recurring states, but whether that repertoire is a stable property of the individual or is reshaped by each new experience has not been tested across diverse naturalistic content within the same person. We characterized the dynamic brain-state repertoire in six individuals who watched the television series Friends across its six seasons during fMRI (up to [~]146 episodes, [~]54 hours per person). For each individual we fit a sticky hierarchical Dirichlet process hidden Markov model across all episodes, discovering brain states (recurring whole-brain activity patterns with characteristic coupling) without pre-specifying their number. Each individuals brain visited roughly forty-five states arrayed along a continuous recurrence gradient, from states active in nearly every episode to episode-specific ones, with no sharp division between them. The repertoire was heterogeneous in why its states recurred: a minority locked to scan-run structure, the majority remaining eligible for content. Transitions were organized by the functional-connectivity similarity between states (per-individual Spearman {rho} = 0.33-0.55) and, in most individuals, respected resting-state network boundaries. Episode content was associated with which states the brain occupied moment to moment. The recurrence ordering discovered in Friends transferred to state occupancy during other social-narrative films (five of six individuals) and attenuated as stimuli departed from that class, weakening for visual-only reading and audio-only listening. Across diverse narrative experience, the dynamic repertoire is a property of the individual: content varies which states are visited and when, not which states exist.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.2%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.2%
3
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 16%
7.0%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.4%
6
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
7
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 18%
5.2%
9
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
10
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
11
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
12
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
13
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.1%
14
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 12%
3.1%
15
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
16
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
17
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
18
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
19
Neuroscience of Consciousness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.0%
22
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
24
Psychological Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%