Back

Effects of antibiotics on the abundance of antibiotic resistance determinants during and after antibiotic administration to beef cattle: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies

Jones, M. L.; Sanchez-Tojar, A.; Bethel, A.; Leonard, A. F. C.; Lamb, E.; Casanova, N. A.; Dominguez, J.; Quiroga, M. P.; Centron, D.; Alonso, A. P.; Fernandez-Miyakawa, M.; Gaze, W.; Petroni, A.; Garside, R.

2026-06-01 microbiology
10.64898/2026.05.31.729110 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundBeef feedlots are increasing concerns that antibiotic use in beef cattle selects for antibiotic resistance, but limitations of primary studies and previous syntheses make it difficult to confirm a consistent effect. We conducted a rigorous systematic review and meta-analysis to summarise: 1) the effect during and after antibiotic administration; 2) its moderation by time since administration started/ended. MethodsEligible studies longitudinally compared beef cattle administered antibiotics to those that were not, measuring resistance determinants in faeces and/or environments. Information sources included Web of Science, CAB Abstracts, and Medline (last searches: 05/03/25). Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I. Meta-analysis was conducted where feasible, using individual participant data where necessary. ResultsThe 33 included studies were mostly small trials of North American feedlot cattle, all with high risks of bias. Meta-analysis of 11 studies of tylosin, ceftiofur, and chlortetracycline indicated positive effects on absolute abundance of resistance both during (SMDH = 0.4; 95% CI = 0.11 to 0.69, p = <0.01) and after (SMDH = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.71, p = <0.01) antibiotic administration. Log-transformed time was positively associated with effect size during (Slope = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.1 to 1.16, p = 0.02), and negatively associated after (Slope = -0.65; 95% CI = -1.24 to -0.06, p = 0.03) DiscussionAvailable evidence indicates time-dependent selection for antibiotic resistance in beef cattle, warranting further regulation to limit human health risks. Simultaneously, uncertainty about precise effect sizes warrants further research. FundingBBSRC Registrationhttps://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RXQHT

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.1%
3
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
4
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
7
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
9
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
10
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
14
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Poultry Science
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
17
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
19
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
25
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
28
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
29
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.5%