Back

Grip Force Complexity Under Constraint: Evidence from Fractal and Entropy Analyses

Cointre, L.; buisseret, F.; Dierick, F.; Boulanger, N.; White, O.

2026-06-03 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.31.729065 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The present study investigates how grip force (GF) and load force (LF) dynamics reorganize under varying task constraints, focusing on the fractal and entropic properties of motor output. Twenty healthy adults performed precision grip tasks across five force conditions: two spontaneous conditions (pre, post) without visual feedback and three target-driven conditions (natural, -10%, +10% of natural). The temporal and informational structure of GF and LF signals were quantified using the Hurst exponent (H) and Sample Entropy (SampEn), capturing long-range temporal organization and local irregularity. Constrained conditions reduced GF coefficient of variation but increased both H and SampEn relative to spontaneous pre-trials, while LF indices remained largely unchanged. Thus, grip control under constraint became more temporally persistent and locally irregular, suggesting a more structured temporal organization rather than a simple loss of complexity. Intra-trial analyses further revealed an increase in H from the first to the second half of spontaneous trials, consistent with progressive self-organization in the absence of explicit constraints. Across conditions, H and SampEn were positively correlated for both GF and LF, suggesting that predictability and complexity are not necessarily inversely related in this context. Overall, these findings suggest that the human motor system adapts to force constraints not by suppressing variability, but by reorganizing it across scales, combining temporal persistence with local flexibility. This multidimensional characterization of variability may help refine theoretical models of optimal movement variability and may inform clinical or training approaches aimed at assessing or enhancing neuromotor adaptability.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.6%
3
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.3%
5
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.7%
7
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.1%
9
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.4%
11
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.3%
12
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
13
Human Movement Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
15
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.5%
17
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
18
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
19
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
23
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%