Back

Phenotypic Profiles of Suicidal Ideation in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: An Interpretable Machine Learning Approach

Zaboski, B. A.; Mattera, E. F.; Pittenger, C. A.

2026-06-02 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.05.31.26354549 medRxiv
Show abstract

Suicidal ideation in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is common and clinically significant, yet much of the existing literature conceptualizes suicide risk through the lens of comorbid depressive symptomatology. The present study examined whether other clinical features can identify clinically meaningful patterns associated with SI. Participants included 231 individuals with clinically significant OCD symptoms. SI was operationalized using Item 9 of the Beck Depression Inventory-II and binarized to reflect the presence or absence of suicidal thoughts. Depression severity scores were intentionally excluded from the predictive feature set, and three machine learning models (ElasticNet, Random Forest, and Explainable Boosting Machines) were evaluated using repeated nested cross-validation. All three algorithms showed comparable predictive performance. Given this overlap, the EBM was selected for interpretation due to its ability to model nonlinear relationships and interaction effects transparently. The model identified quality of life, obsessive-compulsive trait severity, somatic burden, and conscientiousness as prominent predictors of SI. Risk functions suggested nonlinear increases in estimated suicide risk at elevated levels of obsessive-compulsive traits and reduced quality of life. Additionally, interaction analyses indicated that severe obsessive-compulsive traits combined with elevated somatic burden were associated with higher estimated suicide risk than either factor alone. These findings suggest that interpretable machine learning can support clinically relevant phenotypic hypothesis generation. They also highlight somatic burden, functional impairment, obsessive-compulsive trait severity, and conscientiousness as potentially underappreciated targets for SI risk assessment in OCD, beyond the traditional focus on depressive comorbidity.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.4%
2
Computational Psychiatry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
3
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.0%
4
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
6
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
7
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
8
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
9
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
10
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
11
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
12
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
13
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.2%
18
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
22
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
24
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%