Back

No Additional Benefit of 185 Hz versus 130 Hz at Equivalent Energy in Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor - A Prospective Clinical Trial

van der Linden, C.; Trapp, P.; Dembek, T. A.; Schedlich-Teufer, C.; Brandt, G. A.; Jergas, H.; Fink, G. R.; Visser-Vandewalle, V.; Barbe, M. T.; Petry-Schmelzer, J. N.

2026-06-02 neurology
10.64898/2026.05.31.26354199 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate nucleus and posterior subthalamic area (VIM/PSA) in Essential Tremor (ET) and the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in Parkinson's disease (PD) are established treatment for tremor. To achieve maximum tremor control, increasing stimulation frequency beyond 130 Hz is part of clinical practice, but lacks scientific evidence. Objective: To compare tremor suppression under total electrical energy delivered (TEED)-equivalent stimulation at 130 Hz versus 185 Hz in STN-DBS for PD and VIM/PSA-DBS for ET. Methods: In this prospective, double-blind study, acute DBS effects were assessed in 18 people with ET (n = 29 hemispheres), and 25 people with PD (n = 30 hemispheres). Tremor-suppressive effects, evaluated by accelerometry, were compared with TEED-equivalent stimulation at 130 Hz and 185 Hz using linear mixed-effects models, explorative pairwise comparisons, and equivalency testing. Results: Linear mixed-effects models revealed no significant effect of stimulation frequency on tremor improvement in both cohorts. Pairwise comparisons showed no consistent differences in total tremor improvement with TEED-equivalent 185 Hz vs 130 Hz DBS. Post-hoc equivalence testing confirmed equivalence of stimulation frequencies under TEED-equivalent conditions within a +/- 20% margin of relative tremor improvement. Conclusion: This study provides Level II evidence that a higher stimulation frequency of 185 Hz does not offer additional benefit in deep brain stimulation for tremor and supports 130 Hz as the standard stimulation frequency for tremor suppression in ET and PD.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.4%
3
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
4
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.3%
6
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
7
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.9%
8
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
9
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
11
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
14
npj Parkinson's Disease
89 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
17
Journal of Parkinson's Disease
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
21
Neurotherapeutics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%