Back

Efficient base editing and development in human embryos without chromosomal alterations

Jerabek, S.; Kim, J.; Sung, J.; Jung, C.; Kulmann, M. I. R.; Isado, M.; Jang, H.-S.; Li, M.; Bhatele, S.; Kappy, M.; Xu, S.; Hwang, G.-h.; Xu, J.; Marin, D.; Woo, J.-S.; Bae, S.; Treff, N.; Egli, D.

2026-06-01 genetics
10.64898/2026.05.30.728989 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cas9-based tools enable the introduction of genetic lesions to investigate DNA repair outcomes and edit the genome at disease-relevant loci. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) induced by CRISPR/Cas9 result in frequent aneuploidy and large deletions, revealing a repair deficiency in early human embryos and limiting the clinical application of this technology. Here we evaluated the DNA repair outcomes of DNA nicks and mismatches introduced using base editors in human embryos at two targets, PCSK9 and HBG. Editing was efficient and, unlike Cas9-induced DSBs, did not result in either chromosomal abnormalities or large deletions. Small insertions or deletions after base editing were rare, and off-target activity was dependent on the guide RNA. Delivering the base editor as a protein at fertilization or at the pronuclear stage allowed normal development to the blastocyst stage and the derivation of edited stem cell lines. In stark contrast, introduction of the editor as RNA resulted in early embryo arrest. Our results demonstrated that, unlike DSBs, DNA nicks and mismatches are efficiently repaired in human embryos, allowing specific on-target changes without genotoxic consequences.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
33.6%
2
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
5
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.1%
8
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
9
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
10
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
12
The CRISPR Journal
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
13
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
14
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.2%
15
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
16
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.1%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.0%
20
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
21
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
22
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
23
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.7%
25
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
27
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
28
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
29
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.5%
30
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.5%