Back

Dual-Method Immune Deconvolution Reveals Subtype-Specific PD-L1 Drivers and a lower case Greek gammaT Cell M2 Macrophage Axis in Breast Cancer

Jain, D.; Misra, H.

2026-06-03 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.05.30.728960 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Most computational studies of the breast cancer immune microenvironment rely on a single deconvolution algorithm. Since different tools analyze different parameters, integrated information across a dataset can be missed. Here, we employed two complementary approaches, xCell and a CIBERSORT-style ssGSEA using LM22 signatures, on 1,099 PAM50-classified primary tumors from the TCGA-BRCA cohort. PD-L1 was highest in basal-like tumors (Kruskal-Wallis p < 0.001) and correlated with CD8+ T cells ({rho} = 0.65) and M1 macrophages ({rho} = 0.67) in that subtype, which fits the standard model of IFN-{gamma}-driven adaptive upregulation. In HER2-enriched cancers, PD-L1 tracked with both effector and regulatory populations simultaneously, while luminal tumors were largely immune-quiet. The most consequential finding involved {gamma}{delta} T cells and M2 macrophages: xCell showed a non-significant correlation ({rho} = 0.048, p = 0.11), whereas CIBERSORT-ssGSEA, using curated {gamma}{delta} gene signatures, produced a significant correlation ({rho}= 0.565, p < 2.2 x 10-{superscript 1}) that held across all five subtypes. A multivariate model explained 49% of PD-L1 variance (adjusted R{superscript 2} = 0.49), and Cox regression incorporating immune features gave a concordance of 0.60. These results suggest a baseline {gamma}{delta}-M2 immunosuppressive circuit in breast cancer, particularly in ER+ disease, that could be useful to set a therapeutic target.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.2%
3
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
6
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
8
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
9
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.9%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
13
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
15
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Cell Communication and Signaling
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
18
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
19
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
21
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
23
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
24
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
28
NAR Cancer
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
29
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.8%
30
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%