Back

Validation of optogenetic approach to investigate fatigable weakness using a zebrafish model of congenital myasthenic syndrome

Lau, J. M. G.; Gaudreau, S. F.; Lochmüller, H. K.; Bui, T. V.; Palacek, K. K.; Spendiff, S.

2026-06-04 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.30.728923 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) are rare inherited diseases of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ). There are 40 identified CMS genes, but many patients go without genetic diagnosis, which suggests new genes have yet to be discovered and characterised. Here, we describe an optogenetic approach to study fatigable muscle weakness and NMJ function in larval zebrafish to facilitate screening approaches for uncovering novel CMS genes. Using blue-light illumination of spinal motoneurons that express channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) to induce muscle contraction, we measure motor defects at the behavioural, synaptic, and genetic level through a novel behavioural assay, standard whole-cell electrophysiology of individual muscle fibers and a customized NMJ gene panel. We employ this approach in synaptotagmin-2 (syt2) morphant zebrafish, an identified CMS gene model, to validate its usefulness. Our customized optogenetic behavioural assay successfully demonstrates reduced, fatigable, locomotor response during repeated activation of spinal motoneurons. Whole-cell electrophysiology recordings of optogenetically-elicited endplate currents in muscle fibers reveal similarities to altered properties of NMJ function in syt2 morphants reported in other studies using the standard paired motoneuron-muscle electrophysiology technique. Finally, we develop a genetic panel of CMS and NMJ-related genes to characterize the expression landscape of syt2 morphants to elucidate potential pathomechanisms and novel therapeutic targets. We propose that this three-tiered approach successfully links behaviour, synaptic motor function, and genetic expression and can be used as a tool in the screening of novel genes associated with CMS.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Disease Models & Mechanisms
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.9%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.5%
4
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.2%
5
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Skeletal Muscle
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
9
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
10
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
11
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
12
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
Human Molecular Genetics
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
15
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
16
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
17
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
18
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
21
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
22
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
25
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%