Back

Prioritizing embryos with lower homozygosity may reduce disease risk in children of related individuals undergoing preimplantation genetic testing

Wolfram, T.; Ahangari, M.; Davidson, I.; Wartschinski, L.; Li, J. H.; Eyre, M.; Stern, D.; Schleede, J.; Haghighi, A.; Carmi, S.; Christensen, M.

2026-06-04 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.05.30.26354526 medRxiv
Show abstract

Consanguinity is a reproductive union between individuals who share a recent common ancestor. These unions are common in many regions of the world and increase the burden of rare recessive disorders by elevating autozygosity in offspring. Current reproductive genetic screening focuses on a limited set of known pathogenic variants, leaving most recessive risk unaddressed. Here we argue that embryo-level autozygosity, quantified as the fraction of the genome in long runs of homozygosity (FROH), is a potentially actionable genomic biomarker that can be integrated into routine preimplantation genetic testing as a homozygosity-informed embryo-prioritization framework (PGT-H) that can be layered onto existing embryo biopsy workflows when couples are already undergoing IVF with PGT-A or PGT-M. Using forward simulations of first-cousin and double-first-cousin couples, we show that siblings conceived by the same couple span a wide range of FROH; selecting the lowest-FROH candidate from a cohort of five embryos reduces FROH by approximately 40% on average. Combining these reductions with empirical effect-size estimates, we estimate that for first-cousin couples this strategy could reduce risk of intellectual disability by roughly 35-45% (corresponding to an absolute risk reduction of about 1.8-2.2%) and potentially reduce excess recessive disease burden, while also modestly reducing risk of common diseases such as type 2 diabetes. We outline how existing PGT-A and PGT-M workflows could potentially be extended to report embryo-level FROH and discuss ethical and counseling considerations. Autozygosity-based embryo prioritization offers a principled way to address a component of recessive risk that current variant-centric approaches miss.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
19.1%
2
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
4
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.4%
5
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
7
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.7%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.7%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.1%
12
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
16
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
17
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
18
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
19
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
20
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
21
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
22
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
23
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
25
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
27
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
28
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
29
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
30
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%