System-specific multimorbidity derived from prescribing data predicts colorectal cancer outcomes: a Scottish data-linkage study.
Barnett, K. N.; Williams, L.; Weller, D.; Mercer, S. W.; Guthrie, B.; Ward, H.; Brewster, D. H.; Hubbard, G.; Campbell, C.
Show abstract
Multimorbidity, the co-existence of two or more long-term conditions, is up to three times more prevalent among people with cancer than in the general population and is associated with poorer survival, particularly for cancers with a more favourable prognosis such as colorectal cancer. In Scotland, multimorbidity is the norm among older adults, emerges earlier in socioeconomically deprived populations, and may contribute to comparatively low cancer survival rates. Despite this, the influence of multimorbidity on the colorectal cancer pathway remains poorly understood. We conducted a Scottish data-linkage study of adults diagnosed with colorectal cancer between 2010 and 2014, linking the Scottish Cancer Registry to national prescribing, hospital admissions, death registration, and bowel screening datasets. Prescribing data were used to derive overall and system-specific comorbidity measures as a proxy for multimorbidity and active disease burden. Associations with stage at diagnosis, treatment, survival, and screening uptake were examined using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates. Among 19,043 patients, 87% had at least one prescribing-based comorbidity, most commonly cardiovascular, nervous system, and gastrointestinal conditions. Overall comorbidity burden was not associated with stage at diagnosis, although laxative-related prescribing was associated with later-stage disease. Increasing comorbidity burden reduced the likelihood of receiving any treatment and surgery, while associations varied across system-specific comorbidities. Higher comorbidity burden was also associated with increased all-cause and colorectal cancer-specific mortality, particularly among patients with respiratory, nervous system, and haematological/nutritional conditions. Screening uptake was not associated with overall comorbidity burden but did differ by system-specific comorbidity. Prescribing-based multimorbidity was highly prevalent and strongly associated with treatment patterns and mortality among patients with colorectal cancer. System-specific multimorbidity measures provided greater discrimination than overall morbidity counts, highlighting the importance of considering distinct multimorbidity profiles when assessing cancer pathways and designing targeted interventions for optimising treatment and survival. Keywords (primary health care, general practice, multimorbidity, comorbidity, colorectal cancer, early diagnosis, cancer treatment, survival)
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeted encouragement of GP consultations for possible cancer symptoms: randomised controlled trial 93%
- Development and validation of a modified Cambridge Multimorbidity Score for use with internationally recognized electronic health record clinical terms (SNOMED CT) 91%
- Primary care consultation length by deprivation and multimorbidity in England 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inequalities in the decline and recovery of pathological cancer diagnoses during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based study 94%
- Diagnostic performance of the faecal immunochemical test for patients with low-risk symptoms of colorectal cancer in primary care: a service evaluation in the South West of England 94%
- Molecular pathways in post-colonoscopy versus detected colorectal cancers: results from a nested case-control study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- An external validation of the QCovid risk prediction algorithm for risk of mortality from COVID-19 in adults: national validation cohort study in England 92%
- COVID-19 collateral: Indirect acute effects of the pandemic on physical and mental health in the UK 91%
- Remote Covid Assessment in Primary Care (RECAP) risk prediction tool: derivation and real-world validation studies 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Epidemiology and excess mortality of antimicrobial resistance in bacteraemias among cancer patients: a cohort study using routinely collected health data from regional hospital trusts in Oxford and Oslo, 2008-2018 92%
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 91%
- Identifying markers of health-seeking behaviour and healthcare access in UK electronic health records 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of worldwide, national and sub-national severity distributions in Burden of Disease studies: a case study of individual cancer types in Scotland 93%
- Socioeconomic inequalities of 3-year survival in formal employees with colorectal cancer between 2012 and 2019 in Colombia 92%
- Ability of known colorectal cancer susceptibility SNPs to predict colorectal cancer risk: A cohort study within the UK Biobank 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.