Back

System-specific multimorbidity derived from prescribing data predicts colorectal cancer outcomes: a Scottish data-linkage study.

Barnett, K. N.; Williams, L.; Weller, D.; Mercer, S. W.; Guthrie, B.; Ward, H.; Brewster, D. H.; Hubbard, G.; Campbell, C.

2026-06-02 primary care research
10.64898/2026.05.30.26354508 medRxiv
Show abstract

Multimorbidity, the co-existence of two or more long-term conditions, is up to three times more prevalent among people with cancer than in the general population and is associated with poorer survival, particularly for cancers with a more favourable prognosis such as colorectal cancer. In Scotland, multimorbidity is the norm among older adults, emerges earlier in socioeconomically deprived populations, and may contribute to comparatively low cancer survival rates. Despite this, the influence of multimorbidity on the colorectal cancer pathway remains poorly understood. We conducted a Scottish data-linkage study of adults diagnosed with colorectal cancer between 2010 and 2014, linking the Scottish Cancer Registry to national prescribing, hospital admissions, death registration, and bowel screening datasets. Prescribing data were used to derive overall and system-specific comorbidity measures as a proxy for multimorbidity and active disease burden. Associations with stage at diagnosis, treatment, survival, and screening uptake were examined using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates. Among 19,043 patients, 87% had at least one prescribing-based comorbidity, most commonly cardiovascular, nervous system, and gastrointestinal conditions. Overall comorbidity burden was not associated with stage at diagnosis, although laxative-related prescribing was associated with later-stage disease. Increasing comorbidity burden reduced the likelihood of receiving any treatment and surgery, while associations varied across system-specific comorbidities. Higher comorbidity burden was also associated with increased all-cause and colorectal cancer-specific mortality, particularly among patients with respiratory, nervous system, and haematological/nutritional conditions. Screening uptake was not associated with overall comorbidity burden but did differ by system-specific comorbidity. Prescribing-based multimorbidity was highly prevalent and strongly associated with treatment patterns and mortality among patients with colorectal cancer. System-specific multimorbidity measures provided greater discrimination than overall morbidity counts, highlighting the importance of considering distinct multimorbidity profiles when assessing cancer pathways and designing targeted interventions for optimising treatment and survival. Keywords (primary health care, general practice, multimorbidity, comorbidity, colorectal cancer, early diagnosis, cancer treatment, survival)

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.9%
2
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
3
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
5
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.4%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
10
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
13
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
15
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
18
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
19
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
20
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
21
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%