Back

Bi-compartmental CSF-Serum Analysis of NfL and GFAP Differentiates Central and Peripheral Pathology in Neuroinfectious Diseases

Erhart, D. K.; Fazeli, B.; Bachhuber, F.; Soylu, O.; Senel, M.; Lewerenz, J.; Otto, M.; Halbgebauer, S.; Tumani, H.

2026-06-02 neurology
10.64898/2026.05.30.26354507 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), established biomarkers of neuroaxonal injury and astroglial pathology, are frequently only assessed in blood, which limits conclusions regarding their origin. Bi-compartmental analyses of CSF and serum may help differentiate central or peripheral origin of biomarker elevation. Moreover, studies on NfL and GFAP in distinct neuroinfectious disease (NID) phenotypes are limited. Methods: This retrospective monocentric study analyzed CSF and serum from patients with (meningo-)encephalitis/myelitis (TI+; n=48), meningitis (TI-; n=80), (cranial) nerve palsies/polyradiculitis (PND; n=61), and 113 non-neuroinflammatory/non-neurodegenerative controls. A bi-compartmental model using scatter plots and simple linear regression was applied to assess the origin of blood biomarker levels and discriminate between central and peripheral pathology. Results: CSF and serum NfL and GFAP z-scores were significantly higher in TI+ compared with TI- (CSF-GFAP p<0.001/sGFAP p=0.0083; CSF-NfL p=0.003/sNfL p=0.0004). TI+ and PND differed only in GFAP levels, which were higher in TI+ (CSF-GFAP p=0.0049/sGFAP p=0.003). Bi-compartmental analysis revealed simultaneous elevation of CSF and serum NfL in TI+, indicating predominantly central origin, whereas PND demonstrated a shift toward higher sNfL levels suggesting peripheral origin. Higher clinical severity (modified Rankin Scale 3-5) was associated with elevated serum and CSF GFAP and NfL (sGFAP p=0.012/sNfL p=0.002; CSF-GFAP p<0.0001/CSF-NfL p=0.0001), which also predicted unfavorable outcome at discharge (sGFAP p=0.006/sNfL p=0.004; CSF-GFAP p=0.003/CSF-NfL p=0.012). Conclusions: NfL and GFAP were associated with brain/myelon involvement in NID, predominantly reflecting central pathology. Despite strong CSF-serum correlations, bi-compartmental approaches provide additional insight into biomarker origin and disease compartment.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.9%
2
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
3
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.2%
5
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
6
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
7
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
10
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
12
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
13
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
14
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
16
Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
18
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
Journal of Neuroinflammation
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
24
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
28
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
29
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%