Back

Clinical Risk Factors and a Prediction Model for Placenta Accreta Spectrum Among Women Without Prior Cesarean Delivery: A Single-Center Cohort Study

Zhai, X.; You, H.; Wei, J.; Wang, N.; Zeng, L.; Zhao, Y.; WANG, Y.

2026-06-02 obstetrics and gynecology
10.64898/2026.05.30.26354499 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is an important cause of severe maternal morbidity. Although prior cesarean delivery is a well-established risk factor, PAS also occurs in women without prior cesarean section (CS), in whom risk may be underestimated. This study evaluated routinely available clinical factors associated with PAS in this population and developed a clinical-history-based prediction model. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women without prior CS who delivered at Peking University Third Hospital, China, from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. PAS was diagnosed according to the 2019 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics clinical and/or histopathological criteria. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors. Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration, decision curve analysis, and stratified 5-fold cross-validation. Analyses were repeated after stratification by placenta previa status. Results: Among 11,148 women without prior CS, 236 had PAS. Independent risk factors in the overall cohort were placenta previa, operative hysteroscopy, uterine curettage, in vitro fertilization, and multifetal pregnancy. The overall clinical prediction model showed an area under the curve of 0.838 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.87), with stable performance in internal validation. In stratified analyses, model discrimination was lower among women without placenta previa (area under the curve, 0.734) and those with placenta previa (area under the curve, 0.647). Conclusions: In this single-center cohort, routinely available clinical history was associated with PAS risk among women without prior CS. The proposed model may help identify patients who warrant targeted PAS imaging or specialist assessment, but external validation and integration with imaging features are needed before broad clinical implementation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
2
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.6%
6
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Placenta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
16
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
17
Physiological Genomics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
18
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
19
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
20
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
23
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
25
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
28
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
29
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
30
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%