Back

Peak performance is repeatable and captures large individual differences in ruby-throated hummingbirds

Gagnon, E. C.; Rios-Orjuela, J. C.; Pilon, L.; Hentschel, P.; Dansereau, A.; Segre, P. S.; Dakin, R.

2026-05-31 zoology
10.64898/2026.05.29.728840 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Locomotor performance often determines the outcome of interactions with competitors, predators, and prey. In flying animals, the asymptotic load-lifting assay measures maximal muscle power output in vertical flight. Previous studies of small birds have shown that load-lifting performance is linked to flight maneuverability and the outcome of competitive species interactions. Here, we quantify sources of performance variation within a species, namely repeatability, and determine the number of trials that accurately capture individual differences. We conducted 124 load-lifting trials on 13 wild-caught male ruby-throated hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris), testing each individual repeatedly over a 3-day period. We report large individual differences in peak performance, with 70% of the total variation in lifted mass attributed to differences among males. Notably, these differences in muscle performance are independent of body mass and size. An additional 23% of the variation in lifted mass was due to short-term fluctuations, wherein a given males performance varied across trials and days. We find no systematic effects of experience or time on load-lifting performance. Using simulation, we test the effect of different sampling protocols for measuring individual performance, and show that single-trial protocols yield the highest repeatabilities, but are less suitable for capturing the true underlying differences among individuals. We discuss recommendations for future studies that aim to measure maximum performance. Overall, our results show that the asymptotic load-lifting assay reveals large individual differences and can closely reflect individuals true maximum capacity. Summary statementMale ruby-throated hummingbirds exhibit large, consistent differences in load-lifting performance, highlighting peak flight performance as a potential driver of differences in competitive abilities between conspecifics.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.5%
3
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.7%
4
Integrative Organismal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
5
Animal Behaviour
73 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.6%
6
Journal of Avian Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
7
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
9
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.9%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.9%
12
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
13
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
14
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
15
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
16
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
17
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
18
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.6%
20
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
21
Marine Ecology Progress Series
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
22
Ethology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.6%
25
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%