Back

Towards understanding of NK cell antigenic specificity

Ustiuzhanina, M. O.; Shagina, I. A.; Nikitin, E.; Klimuk, E.; Britanova, O.; Ventura-Carmenate, Y.; Kovalenko, E.; Chudakov, D. M.

2026-06-01 immunology
10.64898/2026.05.29.728791 bioRxiv
Show abstract

NK cells can form clonal populations demonstrating features of adaptive immunity, including long-term memory and at least partial antigenic specificity. Given the limited individual diversity of activating receptors, the nature of NK cell antigenic specificity remains elusive. To explore this riddle, we combined scRNA-Seq of ex vivo FACS-sorted NK cell subsets expressing specific KIR receptors, single-cell cloning and bulk RNA-Seq of in vitro cultured KIR2DS4 NK cell clones, transcriptomic profiling of antigen-stimulated NK cells, and in silico modeling of glycosylated KIR2DS4-peptide-HLA complexes. scRNA-Seq resolved 12-15 clusters per KIR subset with highly heterogeneous KIR, KLRC and NCR expression patterns, consistent with clonal lineages. Notably, those clusters demonstrated over 30 differentially expressed glycosyltransferase genes, potentially involved in post-translational modification of NK cell receptors. Single-cell-derived KIR2DS4 cultures exhibited clone-specific cytotoxic, chemokine and KIR receptor genes, and transcriptional differences in > 40 glycosyltransferases. In peptide culturing autologous assays, SARS-CoV-2 (KTFPPTEPK) and EBV (CRAKFKHLL) peptides elicited NK cell proliferation and distinct transcriptional programs linking cytotoxicity genes, KIR2DS4 and glycosyltransferases. Structural modeling revealed that N-linked glycosyl residues in specific regions of KIR2DS4 may alter its contacts and interaction with MHCI and the presented peptide. We conclude that KIR human NK cells comprise clonally imprinted populations with distinct glycosyltransferase expression profiles, and site-specific KIR2DS4 glycosylation may modulate interaction with peptide-MHCI complexes, suggesting a post-translational layer of clonal NK cell diversification as a clue to their antigenic specificity.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
18.6%
2
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.1%
3
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
9.1%
4
The Journal of Immunology
146 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.2%
5
Science Immunology
81 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.3%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
8
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.9%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.9%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.6%
11
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
12
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Nature Immunology
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
15
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
18
Cellular & Molecular Immunology
14 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.7%
20
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
22
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
23
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
24
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%